foodstruct logo
Find food by nutritional value | Diet analysis

Chuck steak vs Pastrami - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Pastrami
Pastrami is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 19mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Pastrami
Pastrami is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 5.979g)
Which food contains less Sugars?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak contains less Sugars (difference - 0.1g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1007mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 70)
Which food is cheaper?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is cheaper (difference - $0.2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chuck steak
Chuck steak is relatively richer in vitamins

Comparison summary table

Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
Chuck steak Pastrami
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in Sugars ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in glycemic index ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals ok
Rich in vitamins ok

Which food is preferable in case of diets?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Chuck steak Pastrami
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low glycemic index diet ok

Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores

Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
30
Chuck steak
21
Pastrami
Mineral Summary Score
43
Chuck steak
46
Pastrami

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains more Iron +10.4%
Contains more Calcium +60%
Contains more Potassium +54.8%
Contains more Magnesium +29.4%
Contains more Zinc +74.3%
Contains more Phosphorus +10.3%
Contains less Sodium -93.4%
Contains more Copper +18.2%
Equal in Iron - 2.22
Equal in Phosphorus - 175
Contains more Iron +10.4%
Contains more Calcium +60%
Contains more Potassium +54.8%
Contains more Magnesium +29.4%
Contains more Zinc +74.3%
Contains more Phosphorus +10.3%
Contains less Sodium -93.4%
Contains more Copper +18.2%
Equal in Iron - 2.22
Equal in Phosphorus - 175

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains more Vitamin D +25%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +26.9%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +18.6%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +183.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +68.8%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +62%
Contains more Vitamin K +128.6%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin A +68%
Contains more Vitamin E +20%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 4.26
Contains more Vitamin D +25%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +26.9%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +18.6%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +183.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +68.8%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +62%
Contains more Vitamin K +128.6%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin A +68%
Contains more Vitamin E +20%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 4.26

Macronutrients Comparison

Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
150%
Chuck steak
131%
Pastrami
Carbohydrates
0%
Chuck steak
0%
Pastrami
Fats
91%
Chuck steak
27%
Pastrami

People also compare

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
Nutrient Chuck steak Pastrami Opinion
Calories 277 147 Chuck steak
Protein 24.98 21.8 Chuck steak
Fats 19.64 5.82 Chuck steak
Vitamin C 0 0.3 Pastrami
Carbs 0 0.36 Pastrami
Cholesterol 87 68 Pastrami
Vitamin D 5 4 Chuck steak
Iron 2.45 2.22 Chuck steak
Calcium 16 10 Chuck steak
Potassium 325 210 Chuck steak
Magnesium 22 17 Chuck steak
Sugars 0 0.1 Pastrami
Fiber 0 0
Copper 0.077 0.091 Pastrami
Zinc 8.68 4.98 Chuck steak
Starch
Phosphorus 193 175 Chuck steak
Sodium 71 1078 Chuck steak
Vitamin A 25 42 Pastrami
Vitamin E 0.1 0.12 Pastrami
Vitamin D 0.1 0.1
Vitamin B1 0.066 0.052 Chuck steak
Vitamin B2 0.191 0.161 Chuck steak
Vitamin B3 4.663 4.26 Chuck steak
Vitamin B5 0.752 0.265 Chuck steak
Vitamin B6 0.373 0.221 Chuck steak
Vitamin B12 3.03 1.87 Chuck steak
Vitamin K 1.6 0.7 Chuck steak
Folic acid (B9) 0 0
Trans Fat 1.287 Pastrami
Saturated Fat 8.66 2.681 Pastrami
Monounsaturated Fat 9.457 2.118 Chuck steak
Polyunsaturated fat 0.81 0.145 Chuck steak
Tryptophan 0.281 0.141 Chuck steak
Threonine 1.099 0.857 Chuck steak
Isoleucine 1.062 0.976 Chuck steak
Leucine 2.009 1.706 Chuck steak
Lysine 2.184 1.812 Chuck steak
Methionine 0.709 0.558 Chuck steak
Phenylalanine 0.951 0.847 Chuck steak
Valine 1.129 1.065 Chuck steak
Histidine 0.809 0.684 Chuck steak
The main source of information is USDA Food Composition Database (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
Dietary Guidelines for Americans is used as the primary source for advice in this web resource
Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.