foodstruct logo
Find food by nutritional value | Diet analysis

Common fig vs Cooking plantain - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Comparison summary

Which food contains less Sugars?
Cooking plantain
Cooking plantain contains less Sugars (difference - 1.26g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Cooking plantain
Cooking plantain is lower in glycemic index (difference - 23)
Which food is cheaper?
Cooking plantain
Cooking plantain is cheaper (difference - $0.6)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Cooking plantain
Cooking plantain is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Common fig
Common fig contains less Sodium (difference - 3mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Common fig
Common fig is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.083g)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in vitamins. See charts below for detailed information.

Comparison summary table

Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
Common fig Cooking plantain
Lower in Sugars ok
Lower in glycemic index ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in Cholesterol Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

Which food is preferable in case of diets?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Common fig Cooking plantain
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low glycemic index diet ok

Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores

Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
8
Common fig
21
Cooking plantain
Mineral Summary Score
8
Common fig
13
Cooking plantain

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains more Calcium +1066.7%
Contains less Sodium -75%
Contains more Iron +62.2%
Contains more Potassium +115.1%
Contains more Magnesium +117.6%
Contains more Copper +15.7%
Contains more Phosphorus +142.9%
Equal in Zinc - 0.14
Contains more Calcium +1066.7%
Contains less Sodium -75%
Contains more Iron +62.2%
Contains more Potassium +115.1%
Contains more Magnesium +117.6%
Contains more Copper +15.7%
Contains more Phosphorus +142.9%
Equal in Zinc - 0.14

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains more Vitamin B1 +15.4%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +15.4%
Contains more Vitamin K +571.4%
Contains more Vitamin C +820%
Contains more Vitamin A +693.7%
Contains more Vitamin E +27.3%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +71.5%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +164.6%
Equal in Vitamin B2 - 0.054
Contains more Vitamin B1 +15.4%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +15.4%
Contains more Vitamin K +571.4%
Contains more Vitamin C +820%
Contains more Vitamin A +693.7%
Contains more Vitamin E +27.3%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +71.5%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +164.6%
Equal in Vitamin B2 - 0.054

Macronutrients Comparison

Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
5%
Common fig
8%
Cooking plantain
Carbohydrates
19%
Common fig
32%
Cooking plantain
Fats
1%
Common fig
2%
Cooking plantain

People also compare

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
Nutrient Common fig Cooking plantain Opinion
Calories 74 122 Cooking plantain
Protein 0.75 1.3 Cooking plantain
Fats 0.3 0.37 Cooking plantain
Vitamin C 2 18.4 Cooking plantain
Carbs 19.18 31.89 Cooking plantain
Cholesterol 0 0
Vitamin D 0 0
Iron 0.37 0.6 Cooking plantain
Calcium 35 3 Common fig
Potassium 232 499 Cooking plantain
Magnesium 17 37 Cooking plantain
Sugars 16.26 15 Common fig
Fiber 2.9 2.3 Common fig
Copper 0.07 0.081 Cooking plantain
Zinc 0.15 0.14 Common fig
Starch
Phosphorus 14 34 Cooking plantain
Sodium 1 4 Common fig
Vitamin A 142 1127 Cooking plantain
Vitamin E 0.11 0.14 Cooking plantain
Vitamin D 0 0
Vitamin B1 0.06 0.052 Common fig
Vitamin B2 0.05 0.054 Cooking plantain
Vitamin B3 0.4 0.686 Cooking plantain
Vitamin B5 0.3 0.26 Common fig
Vitamin B6 0.113 0.299 Cooking plantain
Vitamin B12 0 0
Vitamin K 4.7 0.7 Common fig
Folic acid (B9) 0 0
Trans Fat 0 0
Saturated Fat 0.06 0.143 Common fig
Monounsaturated Fat 0.066 0.032 Common fig
Polyunsaturated fat 0.144 0.069 Common fig
Tryptophan 0.006 0.015 Cooking plantain
Threonine 0.024 0.034 Cooking plantain
Isoleucine 0.023 0.036 Cooking plantain
Leucine 0.033 0.059 Cooking plantain
Lysine 0.03 0.06 Cooking plantain
Methionine 0.006 0.017 Cooking plantain
Phenylalanine 0.018 0.044 Cooking plantain
Valine 0.028 0.046 Cooking plantain
Histidine 0.011 0.064 Cooking plantain
The main source of information is USDA Food Composition Database (U.S. Department of Agriculture)
Dietary Guidelines for Americans is used as the primary source for advice in this web resource
Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.