Chocolate chip cookie vs. Keebler Sugar Cones — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the main differences between Chocolate chip cookie and Keebler Sugar Cones?
- Chocolate chip cookie is richer in Phosphorus, Magnesium, and Folate, while Keebler Sugar Cones are higher in Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Iron, and Vitamin B2.
- Chocolate chip cookie's daily need coverage for Saturated Fat is 66% higher.
We used Cookies, chocolate chip, prepared from recipe, made with butter and KEEBLER, Sugar Cones types in this comparison.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Magnesium
+511.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+4900%
Contains
more
Potassium
+85.7%
Contains
more
Iron
+29%
Equal in Sodium - 326
Contains
more
Magnesium
+511.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+4900%
Contains
more
Potassium
+85.7%
Contains
more
Iron
+29%
Equal in Sodium - 326
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Folate
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+128.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+58.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+171.1%
Contains
more
Folate
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+128.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+58.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+171.1%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Fats
+667.6%
Contains
more
Water
+470%
Contains
more
Protein
+28.1%
Contains
more
Carbs
+34%
Contains
more
Other
+400%
Protein:
5.7 g
Fats:
28.4 g
Carbs:
58.2 g
Water:
5.7 g
Other:
2 g
Protein:
7.3 g
Fats:
3.7 g
Carbs:
78 g
Water:
1 g
Other:
10 g
Contains
more
Fats
+667.6%
Contains
more
Water
+470%
Contains
more
Protein
+28.1%
Contains
more
Carbs
+34%
Contains
more
Other
+400%
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+312.1%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+467.6%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-94.3%
Saturated Fat:
14.071 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
8.241 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
4.541 g
Saturated Fat:
0.8 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
2 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
0.8 g
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+312.1%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+467.6%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-94.3%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 58.2g | 75.9g |
|
| Protein | 5.7g | 7.3g |
|
| Fats | 28.4g | 3.7g |
|
| Carbs | 58.2g | 78g |
|
| Calories | 488kcal | 375kcal |
|
| Sugar | 26.4g |
|
|
| Fiber | 2.1g |
|
|
| Calcium | 38mg |
|
|
| Iron | 2.48mg | 3.2mg |
|
| Magnesium | 55mg | 9mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 100mg | 2mg |
|
| Potassium | 221mg | 119mg |
|
| Sodium | 341mg | 326mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.94mg |
|
|
| Copper | 0.386mg |
|
|
| Manganese | 0.663mg |
|
|
| Selenium | 11.2µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 594IU |
|
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 139µg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 0.2mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.184mg | 0.42mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.177mg | 0.28mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 1.365mg | 3.7mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.259mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.084mg |
|
|
| Folate | 33µg | 0µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.08µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.072mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.191mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.224mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.391mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.214mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.106mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.27mg |
|
|
| Valine | 0.279mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.123mg |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 14.071g | 0.8g |
|
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.003g |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.241g | 2g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.541g | 0.8g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
20%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
55%
18%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Keebler Sugar Cones contains less Sodium (difference - 15mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 13.271g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Keebler Sugar Cones is lower in glycemic index (difference - 50)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chocolate chip cookie is lower in Sugar (difference - 26.4g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chocolate chip cookie is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.