Tomato seed oil vs. Safflower oil — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the main differences between Tomato seed oil and Safflower oil?
- Tomato seed oil is richer in Polyunsaturated fat, yet Safflower oil is richer in Vitamin E, and Monounsaturated Fat.
- Safflower oil's daily need coverage for Vitamin E is 202% higher.
- Tomato seed oil has 4 times more Polyunsaturated fat than Safflower oil. Tomato seed oil has 53.1g of Polyunsaturated fat, while Safflower oil has 12.82g.
- Safflower oil contains less Saturated Fat.
We used Oil, tomatoseed and Oil, safflower, salad or cooking, high oleic (primary safflower oil of commerce) types in this comparison.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +797.4% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~0µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
100 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0 g
Other:
0 g
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
100 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
0 g
Other:
0 g
~equal in
Protein
~0g
~equal in
Fats
~100g
~equal in
Carbs
~0g
~equal in
Water
~0g
~equal in
Other
~0g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
19.7 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
22.8 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
53.1 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
7.541 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
75.221 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
12.82 g
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +314.2% |
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -61.7% |
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +229.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Lower in Glycemic Index | |||
Lower in Saturated Fat | |||
Rich in vitamins | |||
Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
Lower in Sodium | Equal | ||
Lower in price | Equal | ||
Rich in minerals | Equal |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | Opinion | ||
Calories | 884kcal | 884kcal | |
Fats | 100g | 100g | |
Vitamin E | 3.8mg | 34.1mg | |
Vitamin K | 7.1µg | ||
Trans Fat | 0.096g | ||
Choline | 0.2mg | ||
Saturated Fat | 19.7g | 7.541g | |
Monounsaturated Fat | 22.8g | 75.221g | |
Polyunsaturated fat | 53.1g | 12.82g | |
Omega-3 - ALA | 0.096g | ||
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 12.724g |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
Low Calories diet | Equal | |
Low Fats diet | Equal | |
Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
Low Glycemic Index diet |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
6%
54%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
0%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tomato seed oil is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Safflower oil is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 12.159g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Safflower oil is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar (0 g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sodium (0 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.