Chinese cabbage vs. Red potato — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Chinese cabbage and Red potato
- Chinese cabbage is richer in Vitamin C, Vitamin K, Vitamin A, Folate, and Calcium, yet Red potato is richer in Copper, Potassium, Vitamin B3, and Vitamin B5.
- Daily need coverage for Vitamin C from Chinese cabbage is 36% higher.
- Chinese cabbage contains 223 times more Vitamin A than Red potato. Chinese cabbage contains 223µg of Vitamin A, while Red potato contains 1µg.
Food types used in this article are Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw and Potatoes, red, flesh and skin, baked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1066.7% |
| Contains more IronIron | +14.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +47.4% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +116.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +728.6% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +110.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +94.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -81.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +257.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +44580% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +12.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +40% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +1525% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +144.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +80% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +219% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +287.5% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +195.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.5 g
Fats:
0.2 g
Carbs:
2.18 g
Water:
95.32 g
Other:
0.8 g
Protein:
2.3 g
Fats:
0.15 g
Carbs:
19.59 g
Water:
76.67 g
Other:
1.29 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +33.3% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +24.3% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +53.3% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +798.6% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +61.3% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.027 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.015 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.096 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.026 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.002 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.043 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +650% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +123.3% |
~equal in
Saturated Fat
~0.026g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 13kcal | 89kcal |
|
| Protein | 1.5g | 2.3g |
|
| Fats | 0.2g | 0.15g |
|
| Vitamin C | 45mg | 12.6mg |
|
| Net carbs | 1.18g | 17.79g |
|
| Carbs | 2.18g | 19.59g |
|
| Magnesium | 19mg | 28mg |
|
| Calcium | 105mg | 9mg |
|
| Potassium | 252mg | 545mg |
|
| Iron | 0.8mg | 0.7mg |
|
| Sugar | 1.18g | 1.43g |
|
| Fiber | 1g | 1.8g |
|
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.174mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.19mg | 0.4mg |
|
| Starch | 15.15g |
|
|
| Phosphorus | 37mg | 72mg |
|
| Sodium | 65mg | 12mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 4468IU | 10IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 223µg | 1µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.09mg | 0.08mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.159mg | 0.173mg |
|
| Selenium | 0.5µg |
|
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.04mg | 0.072mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.07mg | 0.05mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.5mg | 1.595mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.088mg | 0.341mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.194mg | 0.212mg |
|
| Vitamin K | 45.5µg | 2.8µg |
|
| Folate | 66µg | 27µg |
|
| Choline | 6.4mg | 18.9mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.027g | 0.026g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.015g | 0.002g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.096g | 0.043g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.015mg | 0.023mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.049mg | 0.075mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.085mg | 0.074mg |
|
| Leucine | 0.088mg | 0.109mg |
|
| Lysine | 0.089mg | 0.12mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.009mg | 0.035mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.044mg | 0.091mg |
|
| Valine | 0.066mg | 0.115mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.026mg | 0.039mg |
|
| Fructose | 0.44g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
52%
16%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
16%
22%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Red potato contains less Sodium (difference - 53mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Red potato is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.001g)
Which food is cheaper?
Red potato is cheaper (difference - $0.4)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Chinese cabbage is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.25g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Chinese cabbage is lower in glycemic index (difference - 57)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.