Kielbasa vs. Cranberry bean raw — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between kielbasa and cranberry bean raw
- Kielbasa has more vitamin C, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat; however, cranberry bean raw is higher in fiber and iron.
- Cranberry bean raw covers your daily need for fiber, 99% more than kielbasa.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked and Beans, cranberry (roman), mature seeds, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +303.2% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.5% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Protein:
23.03 g
Fats:
1.23 g
Carbs:
60.05 g
Water:
12.39 g
Other:
3.3 g
| Contains more FatsFats | +1330.9% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +400.4% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +75.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1439.7% |
~equal in
Other
~3.3g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.316 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.106 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.527 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +7701.9% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +342.1% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -94.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Folate | 604µg | 151% | |
| Fiber | 0g | 24.7g | 99% |
| Copper | 0.794mg | 88% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.747mg | 62% | |
| Phosphorus | 372mg | 53% | |
| Sodium | 1200mg | 6mg | 52% |
| Iron | 1.24mg | 5mg | 47% |
| Manganese | 0.92mg | 40% | |
| Potassium | 1332mg | 39% | |
| Magnesium | 156mg | 37% | |
| Zinc | 3.63mg | 33% | |
| Saturated fat | 6.23g | 0.316g | 27% |
| Fats | 17.6g | 1.23g | 25% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.309mg | 24% | |
| Cholesterol | 70mg | 0mg | 23% |
| Selenium | 12.7µg | 23% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.27g | 0.106g | 20% |
| Protein | 13.1g | 23.03g | 20% |
| Carbs | 3.9g | 60.05g | 19% |
| Vitamin C | 14.8mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.213mg | 16% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.748mg | 15% | |
| Calcium | 127mg | 13% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 2.33g | 0.527g | 12% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.455mg | 9% | |
| Calories | 226kcal | 335kcal | 5% |
| Net carbs | 3.9g | 35.35g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.273mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.969mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.017mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.838mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.58mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.346mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.245mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.205mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.641mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
4%
64%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
117%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Kielbasa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 7)
Which food is cheaper?
Kielbasa is cheaper (difference - $0.9)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cranberry bean raw is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 70mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Cranberry bean raw is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cranberry bean raw contains less Sodium (difference - 1194mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cranberry bean raw is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 5.914g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Cranberry bean raw is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Cranberry bean raw is relatively richer in vitamins