Marble cake vs. Shrimp — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are marble cake and shrimp different?
- Marble cake is richer in iron, phosphorus, and monounsaturated fat, while shrimp is higher in copper, zinc, and magnesium.
- Shrimp covers your daily need for cholesterol, 63% more than marble cake.
- Marble cake contains 99 times more monounsaturated fat than shrimp. Marble cake contains 4.75g of monounsaturated fat, while shrimp contains 0.048g.
- Shrimp is lower in saturated fat.
Cake, pudding-type, marble, dry mix and Crustaceans, shrimp, cooked (not previously frozen) types were used in this article.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more IronIron | +217.6% |
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +16% |
Contains more ManganeseManganese | +321.2% |
Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +116.7% |
Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +110.6% |
Contains more CopperCopper | +180.7% |
Contains more ZincZinc | +368.6% |
Contains less SodiumSodium | -78.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
3.4 g
Fats:
11.7 g
Carbs:
79.5 g
Water:
3.1 g
Other:
2.3 g
Protein:
23.98 g
Fats:
0.28 g
Carbs:
0.2 g
Water:
74.33 g
Other:
1.21 g
Contains more FatsFats | +4078.6% |
Contains more CarbsCarbs | +39650% |
Contains more OtherOther | +90.1% |
Contains more ProteinProtein | +605.3% |
Contains more WaterWater | +2297.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.45 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.75 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
3.779 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.056 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.048 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.079 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +9795.8% |
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +4683.5% |
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -97.7% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugar |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated fat |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol |
![]() |
||
Lower in Glycemic Index |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Rich in vitamins |
![]() |
||
Rich in minerals | Equal |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
Cholesterol | 0mg | 189mg | 63% |
Protein | 3.4g | 23.98g | 41% |
Copper | 0.135mg | 0.379mg | 27% |
Carbs | 79.5g | 0.2g | 26% |
Polyunsaturated fat | 3.779g | 0.079g | 25% |
Fats | 11.7g | 0.28g | 18% |
Sodium | 519mg | 111mg | 18% |
Calories | 416kcal | 99kcal | 16% |
Vitamin B1 | 0.181mg | 15% | |
Iron | 1.62mg | 0.51mg | 14% |
Monounsaturated fat | 4.75g | 0.048g | 12% |
Fiber | 2.9g | 12% | |
Zinc | 0.35mg | 1.64mg | 12% |
Saturated fat | 2.45g | 0.056g | 11% |
Vitamin B2 | 0.13mg | 10% | |
Vitamin B3 | 1.546mg | 10% | |
Folate | 36µg | 9% | |
Vitamin E | 0.85mg | 6% | |
Magnesium | 18mg | 39mg | 5% |
Phosphorus | 275mg | 237mg | 5% |
Manganese | 0.139mg | 0.033mg | 5% |
Selenium | 2.6µg | 5% | |
Potassium | 123mg | 259mg | 4% |
Caffeine | 7mg | 2% | |
Vitamin B6 | 0.025mg | 2% | |
Vitamin B5 | 0.096mg | 2% | |
Vitamin K | 2.8µg | 2% | |
Choline | 4.5mg | 1% | |
Calcium | 76mg | 70mg | 1% |
Net carbs | 76.6g | 0.2g | N/A |
Sugar | 35.71g | N/A | |
Vitamin A | 1µg | 0% | |
Trans fat | 0.002g | N/A | |
Tryptophan | 0.049mg | 0% | |
Threonine | 0.105mg | 0% | |
Isoleucine | 0.127mg | 0% | |
Leucine | 0.22mg | 0% | |
Lysine | 0.133mg | 0% | |
Methionine | 0.049mg | 0% | |
Phenylalanine | 0.158mg | 0% | |
Valine | 0.164mg | 0% | |
Histidine | 0.065mg | 0% | |
Omega-3 - EPA | 0g | 0.015g | N/A |
Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.015g | N/A |
Omega-3 - ALA | 0.001g | N/A | |
Omega-3 - DPA | 0g | 0.001g | N/A |
Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid | 0.001g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.002g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.018g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?


is better in case of low diet
![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet |
![]() |
|
Low Glycemic Index diet |
![]() |
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
13%

0%

Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
38%

38%

Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?

Shrimp is lower in Sugar (difference - 35.71g)
Which food contains less Sodium?

Shrimp contains less Sodium (difference - 408mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?

Shrimp is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.394g)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?

Marble cake is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 189mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?

Marble cake is lower in glycemic index (difference - 50)
Which food is cheaper?

Marble cake is cheaper (difference - $7)
Which food is richer in vitamins?

Marble cake is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.