Parsley vs Oregano - Health impact and Nutrition Comparison


Introduction
Herbs and spices are a perfect way to boost flavor and give a fantastic look to any dish and parsley is one of them. It is also used in culinary due to its huge amount of nutrients and vitamins. Oregano, being a mint family member, is another widely used species with a number of health benefits. For its unique flavor it is grateful to thymol, carvacol, ocimene, pinene, limonene and caryophyllene. It not only provides pleasant smell, but also has a lot of health claims thanks to its antioxidants and anti-bacterial features.
Nutritional Content Comparison
Taking a glance at the comparison chart below you can easily notice that the amount of useful vitamins is considerably higher in the first food, whereas the second one contains a few times more minerals in contrast to its “brother” plant. It is enough to mention that the amount of calcium is 10x more in oregano and that of Vitamin A is almost 5x more in parsley.
Health Impact
From scientific viewpoint we dare to mention that parsley is more discussed and explored than oregano. Myrecetin, a flavonoid found in the first green is believed to help prevent skin cancer. Its effectiveness has been proved in the prevention and treatment of diabetes. This study proves the antiviral properties of the other green against MNV and it is considered a sanitizer to control human norovirus. Generally, these two foods are a wonderful method for:
- Cancer prevention
- Bone health improvement
- Anti-bacterial properties
- Anti-inflammatory properties
SUMMARY
To sum up, we should mention that oregano contains significantly more vitamins and minerals than parsley. Moreover, both parsley and oregano have been in the center of scientific attention, though parsley is discussed a little more. However, both are irreplaceable as a source of antioxidants and vitamins for your dish.
Infographic

Mineral Comparison
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores




Macronutrients Comparison






Comparison summary table
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugars |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated Fat |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in glycemic index |
![]() |
||
Rich in minerals |
![]() |
||
Rich in vitamins |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol | Equal |
Which food is preferable in case of diets?


![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet |
![]() |
|
Low glycemic index diet |
![]() |
People also compare
Comparison summary







All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
Opinion |
Calories | 36 | 265 |
![]() |
Protein | 2.97 | 9 |
![]() |
Fats | 0.79 | 4.28 |
![]() |
Vitamin C | 133 | 2.3 |
![]() |
Carbs | 6.33 | 68.92 |
![]() |
Cholesterol | 0 | 0 | |
Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
Iron | 6.2 | 36.8 |
![]() |
Calcium | 138 | 1597 |
![]() |
Potassium | 554 | 1260 |
![]() |
Magnesium | 50 | 270 |
![]() |
Sugars | 0.85 | 4.09 |
![]() |
Fiber | 3.3 | 42.5 |
![]() |
Copper | 0.149 | 0.633 |
![]() |
Zinc | 1.07 | 2.69 |
![]() |
Starch | |||
Phosphorus | 58 | 148 |
![]() |
Sodium | 56 | 25 |
![]() |
Vitamin A | 8424 | 1701 |
![]() |
Vitamin E | 0.75 | 18.26 |
![]() |
Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
Vitamin B1 | 0.086 | 0.177 |
![]() |
Vitamin B2 | 0.098 | 0.528 |
![]() |
Vitamin B3 | 1.313 | 4.64 |
![]() |
Vitamin B5 | 0.4 | 0.921 |
![]() |
Vitamin B6 | 0.09 | 1.044 |
![]() |
Vitamin B12 | 0 | 0 | |
Vitamin K | 1640 | 621.7 |
![]() |
Folate, total | 152 | 237 |
![]() |
Folic acid (B9) | 0 | 0 | |
Trans Fat | 0 | 0 | |
Saturated Fat | 0.132 | 1.551 |
![]() |
Monounsaturated Fat | 0.295 | 0.716 |
![]() |
Polyunsaturated fat | 0.124 | 1.369 |
![]() |
Tryptophan | 0.045 | 0.203 |
![]() |
Threonine | 0.122 | 0.322 |
![]() |
Isoleucine | 0.118 | 0.441 |
![]() |
Leucine | 0.204 | 0.78 |
![]() |
Lysine | 0.181 | 0.5 |
![]() |
Methionine | 0.042 | 0.127 |
![]() |
Phenylalanine | 0.145 | 0.449 |
![]() |
Valine | 0.172 | 0.585 |
![]() |
Histidine | 0.061 | 0.144 |
![]() |
Fructose | 1.13 |
![]() |