Pork chop vs. Tuna Bluefin — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are pork chop and tuna Bluefin different?
- Pork chop is richer in zinc and vitamin B1, while tuna Bluefin is higher in vitamin B12, vitamin A, selenium, vitamin B3, phosphorus, and magnesium.
- Tuna Bluefin covers your daily need for vitamin B12, 426% more than pork chop.
- Pork chop contains 4 times more zinc than tuna Bluefin. Pork chop contains 3.15mg of zinc, while tuna Bluefin contains 0.77mg.
- Tuna Bluefin is lower in saturated fat.
Pork, fresh, loin, blade (chops), bone-in, separable lean and fat, cooked, broiled and Fish, tuna, fresh, bluefin, cooked, dry heat types were used in this article.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more CalciumCalcium | +460% |
Contains more ZincZinc | +309.1% |
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +220% |
Contains more IronIron | +50.6% |
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +35.3% |
Contains less SodiumSodium | -32.4% |
Contains more ManganeseManganese | +100% |
Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +28.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +76.3% |
Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +18825% |
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +33% |
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +24.1% |
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +1548.5% |
Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
23.72 g
Fats:
14.35 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
61.45 g
Other:
0.48 g
Protein:
29.91 g
Fats:
6.28 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
59.09 g
Other:
4.72 g
Contains more FatsFats | +128.5% |
Contains more ProteinProtein | +26.1% |
Contains more OtherOther | +883.3% |
~equal in
Carbs
~0g
~equal in
Water
~59.09g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
4.339 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.887 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.894 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
1.612 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.053 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.844 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +138% |
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -62.8% |
~equal in
Polyunsaturated fat
~1.844g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugar |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated fat |
![]() |
||
Rich in minerals |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
Rich in vitamins | Equal |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
Vitamin B12 | 0.66µg | 10.88µg | 426% |
Vitamin A | 4µg | 757µg | 84% |
Zinc | 3.15mg | 0.77mg | 22% |
Selenium | 36.4µg | 46.8µg | 19% |
Vitamin B1 | 0.49mg | 0.278mg | 18% |
Vitamin B3 | 7.927mg | 10.54mg | 16% |
Phosphorus | 241mg | 326mg | 12% |
Choline | 67.5mg | 12% | |
Protein | 23.72g | 29.91g | 12% |
Fats | 14.35g | 6.28g | 12% |
Saturated fat | 4.339g | 1.612g | 12% |
Cholesterol | 78mg | 49mg | 10% |
Magnesium | 20mg | 64mg | 10% |
Monounsaturated fat | 4.887g | 2.053g | 7% |
Iron | 0.87mg | 1.31mg | 6% |
Vitamin D | 40IU | 5% | |
Vitamin D | 1µg | 5% | |
Calcium | 56mg | 10mg | 5% |
Vitamin B5 | 1.104mg | 1.37mg | 5% |
Vitamin B6 | 0.489mg | 0.525mg | 3% |
Calories | 231kcal | 184kcal | 2% |
Vitamin B2 | 0.313mg | 0.306mg | 1% |
Vitamin E | 0.21mg | 1% | |
Folate | 0µg | 2µg | 1% |
Sodium | 74mg | 50mg | 1% |
Copper | 0.105mg | 0.11mg | 1% |
Potassium | 315mg | 323mg | 0% |
Manganese | 0.01mg | 0.02mg | 0% |
Trans fat | 0.066g | N/A | |
Polyunsaturated fat | 1.894g | 1.844g | 0% |
Tryptophan | 0.282mg | 0.335mg | 0% |
Threonine | 1.043mg | 1.311mg | 0% |
Isoleucine | 1.123mg | 1.378mg | 0% |
Leucine | 1.952mg | 2.431mg | 0% |
Lysine | 2.109mg | 2.747mg | 0% |
Methionine | 0.65mg | 0.885mg | 0% |
Phenylalanine | 0.985mg | 1.168mg | 0% |
Valine | 1.2mg | 1.541mg | 0% |
Histidine | 0.965mg | 0.88mg | 0% |
Omega-3 - EPA | 0g | 0.363g | N/A |
Omega-3 - DHA | 0.001g | 1.141g | N/A |
Omega-3 - ALA | 0.065g | N/A | |
Omega-3 - DPA | 0.011g | 0.16g | N/A |
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.003g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.065g | N/A | |
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.922g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?


is better in case of low diet
![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal |
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
51%

166%

Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
53%

59%

Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?

Tuna Bluefin is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 29mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?

Tuna Bluefin is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?

Tuna Bluefin contains less Sodium (difference - 24mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?

Tuna Bluefin is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.727g)
Which food is richer in minerals?

Tuna Bluefin is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?

Pork chop is cheaper (difference - $6.2)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.