Taro vs Napa cabbage - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Taro and Napa cabbage different?
- Taro is richer in Vitamin B6, Potassium, Phosphorus, Copper, Manganese, Vitamin B1, Magnesium and Vitamin B5, while Napa cabbage is higher in Folate.
- Taro covers your daily need of Vitamin B6 19% more than Napa cabbage.
- Taro contains 19 times more Vitamin B1 than Napa cabbage. Taro contains 0.095mg of Vitamin B1, while Napa cabbage contains 0.005mg.
Taro, raw and Cabbage, napa, cooked types were used in this article.
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Calcium
+48.3%
Contains
more
Potassium
+579.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+312.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+79.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+64.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+342.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+34.5%
Equal in Sodium - 11
Contains
more
Calcium
+48.3%
Contains
more
Potassium
+579.3%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+312.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+79.2%
Contains
more
Zinc
+64.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+342.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+34.5%
Equal in Sodium - 11
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+40.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+1800%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+28.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+765.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+664.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+246.1%
Contains
more
Folate
+95.5%
Equal in Vitamin B2 - 0.025
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+40.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+1800%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+28.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+765.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+664.9%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+246.1%
Contains
more
Folate
+95.5%
Equal in Vitamin B2 - 0.025
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
18
7
Mineral Summary Score
26
12
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
9%
7%
Carbohydrates
26%
2%
Fats
1%
1%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Lower in Sodium | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Taro is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Taro is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Sugars?
Napa cabbage contains less Sugars (difference - 0.4g)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Napa cabbage is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.041g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Napa cabbage is lower in glycemic index (difference - 21)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sodium (11 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 112 | 12 |
|
| Protein | 1.5 | 1.1 |
|
| Fats | 0.2 | 0.17 |
|
| Vitamin C | 4.5 | 3.2 |
|
| Carbs | 26.46 | 2.23 |
|
| Cholesterol | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Iron | 0.55 | 0.74 |
|
| Calcium | 43 | 29 |
|
| Potassium | 591 | 87 |
|
| Magnesium | 33 | 8 |
|
| Sugars | 0.4 |
|
|
| Fiber | 4.1 |
|
|
| Copper | 0.172 | 0.096 |
|
| Zinc | 0.23 | 0.14 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 84 | 19 |
|
| Sodium | 11 | 11 | |
| Vitamin A | 76 | 263 |
|
| Vitamin E | 2.38 |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.095 | 0.005 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.025 | 0.025 | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.6 | 0.466 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.303 | 0.035 |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.283 | 0.037 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin K | 1 |
|
|
| Folate | 22 | 43 |
|
| Trans Fat | 0 | 0 | |
| Saturated Fat | 0.041 |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.016 |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.083 |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.023 |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.069 |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.054 |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.111 |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.067 |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.02 |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.082 |
|
|
| Valine | 0.082 |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.034 |
|
|
| Fructose |