Tuna Bluefin vs. Edible mushroom — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are tuna Bluefin and edible mushroom different?
- Tuna Bluefin is richer in vitamin B12, selenium, vitamin A, vitamin B3, phosphorus, vitamin B6, vitamin B1, and magnesium, while edible mushroom is higher in copper.
- Tuna Bluefin covers your daily need for vitamin B12, 452% more than edible mushroom.
- Edible mushroom is lower in cholesterol.
- Edible mushroom has a higher glycemic index (32) than tuna Bluefin (0).
Fish, tuna, fresh, bluefin, cooked, dry heat and Mushrooms, white, raw types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +611.1% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +233.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +162% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +48.1% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +279.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +403.2% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +189.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -90% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +135% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +243.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +192.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +404.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +27100% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +31.4% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +750% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
29.91 g
Fats:
6.28 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
59.09 g
Other:
4.72 g
Protein:
3.09 g
Fats:
0.34 g
Carbs:
3.26 g
Water:
92.45 g
Other:
0.86 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +868% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1747.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +448.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +56.5% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
1.612 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.053 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.844 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.05 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.16 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +∞% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1052.5% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -96.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 10.88µg | 0.04µg | 452% |
| Vitamin A | 757µg | 0µg | 84% |
| Selenium | 46.8µg | 9.3µg | 68% |
| Protein | 29.91g | 3.09g | 54% |
| Vitamin B3 | 10.54mg | 3.607mg | 43% |
| Phosphorus | 326mg | 86mg | 34% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.525mg | 0.104mg | 32% |
| Copper | 0.11mg | 0.318mg | 23% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.278mg | 0.081mg | 16% |
| Cholesterol | 49mg | 0mg | 16% |
| Magnesium | 64mg | 9mg | 13% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.844g | 0.16g | 11% |
| Iron | 1.31mg | 0.5mg | 10% |
| Fats | 6.28g | 0.34g | 9% |
| Calories | 184kcal | 22kcal | 8% |
| Saturated fat | 1.612g | 0.05g | 7% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.306mg | 0.402mg | 7% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.053g | 0g | 5% |
| Fiber | 0g | 1g | 4% |
| Folate | 2µg | 17µg | 4% |
| Choline | 17.3mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.37mg | 1.497mg | 3% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 2.1mg | 2% |
| Zinc | 0.77mg | 0.52mg | 2% |
| Sodium | 50mg | 5mg | 2% |
| Calcium | 10mg | 3mg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 7IU | 1% | |
| Carbs | 0g | 3.26g | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.02mg | 0.047mg | 1% |
| Vitamin D | 0.2µg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 0g | 2.26g | N/A |
| Potassium | 323mg | 318mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 1.98g | N/A | |
| Vitamin E | 0.01mg | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.335mg | 0.035mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 1.311mg | 0.107mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.378mg | 0.076mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.431mg | 0.12mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.747mg | 0.107mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.885mg | 0.031mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.168mg | 0.085mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.541mg | 0.232mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.88mg | 0.057mg | 0% |
| Fructose | 0.17g | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.363g | 0g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 1.141g | 0g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.16g | 0g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
166%
26%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
59%
27%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tuna Bluefin is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.98g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tuna Bluefin is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tuna Bluefin is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Edible mushroom is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 49mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Edible mushroom contains less Sodium (difference - 45mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Edible mushroom is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.562g)
Which food is cheaper?
Edible mushroom is cheaper (difference - $6)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.