Riesling vs. Coca-Cola — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Important differences between riesling and Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of Coca-Cola is 63, while the glycemic index of riesling is 0.

The food varieties used in the comparison are Alcoholic beverage, wine, table, white, Riesling and Beverages, carbonated, cola, fast-food cola.

Infographic

Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

The mineral comparison score is based on which food has a more favorable amount of each mineral. The �coverage� charts below show how much of the daily mineral needs are covered by the selected amount of each food.

Riesling

Coca-Cola

Contains less SodiumSodium

-100%

Contains more CalciumCalcium	+∞%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium	+∞%
Contains more IronIron	+∞%
Contains more CopperCopper	+∞%
Contains more ZincZinc	+∞%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus	+∞%
Contains more ManganeseManganese	+∞%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium	+∞%

~equal in Magnesium ~0mg

Vitamin Comparison

The vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins in which one food is richer than the other. The �coverage� charts below show how much of the daily vitamin needs are covered by the selected amount of each food.

Riesling

Coca-Cola

~equal in Vitamin C ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin E ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B1 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B2 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B3 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B5 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B6 ~0mg

~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

~equal in Vitamin K ~0µg

~equal in Folate ~0µg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient			DV% diff.
Calories	80kcal	37kcal	2%
Carbs	3.74g	9.56g	2%
Caffeine		8mg	2%
Iron		0.11mg	1%
Phosphorus		10mg	1%
Protein	0.07g	0.07g	0%
Weight per 100 calories	125g	270g	N/A
Fats	0g	0.02g	0%
Net carbs	3.74g	9.56g	N/A
Calcium		2mg	0%
Potassium		2mg	0%
Sugar		8.97g	N/A
Copper		0.001mg	0%
Zinc		0.02mg	0%
Sodium		4mg	0%
Manganese		0.002mg	0%
Selenium		0.1µg	0%
Choline		0.3mg	0%