3 musketeers vs. Tootsie roll — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Summary of differences between 3 musketeers and tootsie roll
- 3 musketeers have more vitamin B12 and fiber; however, tootsie roll is higher in vitamin K.
- 3 musketeers cover your daily need for saturated fat, 38% more than tootsie roll.
- Tootsie roll has less saturated fat.
These are the specific foods used in this comparison Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, 3 MUSKETEERS Bar and Candies, TOOTSIE ROLL, chocolate-flavor roll.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +31.8% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +50% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +14.7% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +19.2% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +37.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +21.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +240.4% |
| Contains more IronIron | +19.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -77.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +15.8% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +50.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +50% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +64.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +25% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +25.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +231% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +125% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.6 g
Fats:
12.75 g
Carbs:
77.77 g
Water:
5.8 g
Other:
1.08 g
Protein:
1.59 g
Fats:
3.31 g
Carbs:
87.73 g
Water:
6.69 g
Other:
0.68 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +63.5% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +285.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +58.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +12.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +15.3% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
8.646 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.373 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.316 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.967 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.929 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.266 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +23% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +18.8% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -88.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 8.646g | 0.967g | 35% |
| Fats | 12.75g | 3.31g | 15% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.16µg | 0µg | 7% |
| Sodium | 194mg | 44mg | 7% |
| Fiber | 1.5g | 0.1g | 6% |
| Vitamin K | 2.9µg | 9.6µg | 6% |
| Starch | 15.3g | 6% | |
| Manganese | 0.16mg | 0.047mg | 5% |
| Carbs | 77.77g | 87.73g | 3% |
| Copper | 0.155mg | 0.13mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.034mg | 0.056mg | 2% |
| Vitamin E | 0.98mg | 0.65mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 20µg | 0µg | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 69mg | 57mg | 2% |
| Calories | 436kcal | 387kcal | 2% |
| Iron | 0.67mg | 0.8mg | 2% |
| Choline | 12.2mg | 2% | |
| Calcium | 54mg | 36mg | 2% |
| Magnesium | 29mg | 22mg | 2% |
| Protein | 2.6g | 1.59g | 2% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.231mg | 0.29mg | 1% |
| Folate | 4µg | 9µg | 1% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.373g | 1.929g | 1% |
| Fructose | 0.4g | 1% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.056mg | 0.07mg | 1% |
| Selenium | 1.9µg | 2.2µg | 1% |
| Zinc | 0.55mg | 0.4mg | 1% |
| Potassium | 133mg | 116mg | 1% |
| Cholesterol | 5mg | 2mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0.2mg | 0mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 76.27g | 87.63g | N/A |
| Sugar | 66.89g | 56.32g | N/A |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.23mg | 0.21mg | 0% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.01mg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 0.129g | N/A | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.316g | 0.266g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.19mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.04mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.06mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.11mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.09mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.01mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.05mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.08mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.03mg | 0% | |
| Caffeine | 7mg | 7mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.016g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
8%
8%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
23%
17%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tootsie roll is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 3mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tootsie roll is lower in Sugar (difference - 10.57g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Tootsie roll contains less Sodium (difference - 150mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tootsie roll is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 7.679g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
3 musketeers is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes ()
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.