Barley vs. Limburger — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are barley and Limburger different?
- Barley is richer in manganese, fiber, copper, vitamin B1, iron, and selenium, while Limburger is higher in calcium and vitamin B12.
- Barley covers your daily need for manganese, 83% more than Limburger.
- Barley is lower in saturated fat.
Barley, hulled and Cheese, limburger types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +533.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +253.1% |
| Contains more IronIron | +2669.2% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +2271.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +31.9% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -98.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +5013.2% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +160% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1406.1% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +48.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +147.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +707.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +2813.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +269.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +33900% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +76.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +317.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +205.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +14895.9% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +60.7% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +1084.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +412.9% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +64.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -97.1% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +123.8% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +2817.3% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 1.943mg | 0.038mg | 83% |
| Saturated fat | 0.482g | 16.746g | 74% |
| Fiber | 17.3g | 0g | 69% |
| Copper | 0.498mg | 0.021mg | 53% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.646mg | 0.08mg | 47% |
| Calcium | 33mg | 497mg | 46% |
| Iron | 3.6mg | 0.13mg | 43% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 1.04µg | 43% |
| Selenium | 37.7µg | 14.5µg | 42% |
| Vitamin A | 1µg | 340µg | 38% |
| Fats | 2.3g | 27.25g | 38% |
| Sodium | 12mg | 800mg | 34% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 90mg | 30% |
| Vitamin B3 | 4.604mg | 0.158mg | 28% |
| Magnesium | 133mg | 21mg | 27% |
| Carbs | 73.48g | 0.49g | 24% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.295g | 8.606g | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.282mg | 1.177mg | 18% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.318mg | 0.086mg | 18% |
| Phosphorus | 264mg | 393mg | 18% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.285mg | 0.503mg | 17% |
| Protein | 12.48g | 20.05g | 15% |
| Potassium | 452mg | 128mg | 10% |
| Folate | 19µg | 58µg | 10% |
| Zinc | 2.77mg | 2.1mg | 6% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.108g | 0.495g | 4% |
| Vitamin D | 0µg | 0.5µg | 3% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin D | 0IU | 20IU | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.57mg | 0.23mg | 2% |
| Calories | 354kcal | 327kcal | 1% |
| Net carbs | 56.18g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.8g | 0.49g | N/A |
| Vitamin K | 2.2µg | 2.3µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.208mg | 0.289mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.424mg | 0.739mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.456mg | 1.219mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.848mg | 2.093mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.465mg | 1.675mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.24mg | 0.619mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.7mg | 1.116mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.612mg | 1.439mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.281mg | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
33%
42%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
110%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.31g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 1)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Barley is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Barley contains less Sodium (difference - 788mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Barley is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.264g)
Which food is cheaper?
Barley is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Barley is relatively richer in minerals