Daikon vs Napa cabbage - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between Daikon and Napa cabbage
- Daikon is richer in Vitamin C, while Napa cabbage is higher in Manganese.
- Daikon covers your daily Vitamin C needs 21% more than Napa cabbage.
- Daikon has 3 times more Potassium than Napa cabbage. Daikon has 227mg of Potassium, while Napa cabbage has 87mg.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Radishes, oriental, raw and Cabbage, napa, cooked.
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Potassium
+160.9%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100%
Contains
more
Copper
+19.8%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+21.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+85%
Contains
less
Sodium
-47.6%
Equal in Calcium - 29
Equal in Zinc - 0.14
Contains
more
Potassium
+160.9%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100%
Contains
more
Copper
+19.8%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+21.1%
Contains
more
Iron
+85%
Contains
less
Sodium
-47.6%
Equal in Calcium - 29
Equal in Zinc - 0.14
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+587.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+294.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+24.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+25%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+133%
Contains
more
Folate
+53.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+587.5%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+294.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+24.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+25%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+133%
Contains
more
Folate
+53.6%
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
11
7
Mineral Summary Score
14
12
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
4%
7%
Carbohydrates
4%
2%
Fats
0%
1%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Lower in glycemic index | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sugars?
Napa cabbage contains less Sugars (difference - 2.5g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Napa cabbage contains less Sodium (difference - 10mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Napa cabbage is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.03g)
Which food is cheaper?
Napa cabbage is cheaper (difference - $0.2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Daikon is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (32)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in vitamins. See charts below for detailed information.
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 18 | 12 |
|
| Protein | 0.6 | 1.1 |
|
| Fats | 0.1 | 0.17 |
|
| Vitamin C | 22 | 3.2 |
|
| Carbs | 4.1 | 2.23 |
|
| Cholesterol | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Iron | 0.4 | 0.74 |
|
| Calcium | 27 | 29 |
|
| Potassium | 227 | 87 |
|
| Magnesium | 16 | 8 |
|
| Sugars | 2.5 |
|
|
| Fiber | 1.6 |
|
|
| Copper | 0.115 | 0.096 |
|
| Zinc | 0.15 | 0.14 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 23 | 19 |
|
| Sodium | 21 | 11 |
|
| Vitamin A | 0 | 263 |
|
| Vitamin E | 0 |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.02 | 0.005 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.02 | 0.025 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.2 | 0.466 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.138 | 0.035 |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.046 | 0.037 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin K | 0.3 |
|
|
| Folate | 28 | 43 |
|
| Trans Fat | 0 | 0 | |
| Saturated Fat | 0.03 |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.017 |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.045 |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.003 |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.025 |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.026 |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.031 |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.03 |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.006 |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.02 |
|
|
| Valine | 0.028 |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.011 |
|
|
| Fructose |