Nattō vs. Plantain raw — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between nattō and plantain raw
- Nattō has more iron, copper, zinc, calcium, phosphorus, vitamin K, magnesium, and selenium; however, plantain raw is richer in vitamin A and vitamin B6.
- Nattō covers your daily iron needs 100% more than plantain raw.
- Plantain raw has 72 times less calcium than nattō. Nattō has 217mg of calcium, while plantain raw has 3mg.
- Nattō has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of nattō is 56, while the glycemic index of plantain raw is 37.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Natto and Plantains, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +210.8% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +7133.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +46.1% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1333.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +723.5% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2064.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +411.8% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +486.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -42.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +207.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +251.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +3200% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +322.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +41.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +1300% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +20.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +130% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +175% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
19.4 g
Fats:
11 g
Carbs:
12.68 g
Water:
55.02 g
Other:
1.9 g
Protein:
1.3 g
Fats:
0.37 g
Carbs:
31.89 g
Water:
65.28 g
Other:
1.16 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1392.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +2873% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +63.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +151.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +18.6% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
1.591 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.43 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
6.21 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.143 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.032 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.069 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +7493.8% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +8900% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -91% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Iron | 8.6mg | 0.6mg | 100% |
| Manganese | 1.528mg | 66% | |
| Copper | 0.667mg | 0.081mg | 65% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 6.21g | 0.069g | 41% |
| Protein | 19.4g | 1.3g | 36% |
| Zinc | 3.03mg | 0.14mg | 26% |
| Calcium | 217mg | 3mg | 21% |
| Phosphorus | 174mg | 34mg | 20% |
| Vitamin K | 23.1µg | 0.7µg | 19% |
| Magnesium | 115mg | 37mg | 19% |
| Fats | 11g | 0.37g | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg | 0.299mg | 13% |
| Selenium | 8.8µg | 1.5µg | 13% |
| Fiber | 5.4g | 2.3g | 12% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.19mg | 0.054mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.16mg | 0.052mg | 9% |
| Choline | 57mg | 13.5mg | 8% |
| Potassium | 729mg | 499mg | 7% |
| Saturated fat | 1.591g | 0.143g | 7% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.43g | 0.032g | 6% |
| Carbs | 12.68g | 31.89g | 6% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 56µg | 6% |
| Vitamin C | 13mg | 18.4mg | 6% |
| Folate | 8µg | 22µg | 4% |
| Calories | 211kcal | 122kcal | 4% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0mg | 0.686mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.215mg | 0.26mg | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.01mg | 0.14mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 7.28g | 29.59g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.89g | 15g | N/A |
| Sodium | 7mg | 4mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.223mg | 0.015mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.813mg | 0.034mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.931mg | 0.036mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 1.509mg | 0.059mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.145mg | 0.06mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.208mg | 0.017mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.941mg | 0.044mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.018mg | 0.046mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.512mg | 0.064mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
18%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
116%
15%
Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?
Plantain raw contains less Sodium (difference - 3mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Plantain raw is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.448g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Plantain raw is lower in glycemic index (difference - 19)
Which food is cheaper?
Plantain raw is cheaper (difference - $2.1)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Nattō is lower in Sugar (difference - 10.11g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Nattō is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.