Nopales vs. Sauerkraut — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between Nopales and Sauerkraut
- Nopales have more Calcium, Manganese, and Magnesium, however, Sauerkraut have more Iron, Vitamin K, Vitamin C, and Folate.
- Sauerkraut's daily need coverage for Sodium is 28% more.
- Nopales have 5 times more Calcium than Sauerkraut. Nopales have 164mg of Calcium, while Sauerkraut has 30mg.
- Nopales are lower in Sodium.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Nopales, raw and Sauerkraut, canned, solids and liquids.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +300% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +446.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +51.2% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +31.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -96.8% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +202.6% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +16.7% |
| Contains more IronIron | +149.2% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +84.6% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +25% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +2438.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +86.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +186.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +79.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +58.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +75% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +85.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +145.3% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +700% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +42.5% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~0µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.32 g
Fats:
0.09 g
Carbs:
3.33 g
Water:
94.12 g
Other:
1.14 g
Protein:
0.91 g
Fats:
0.14 g
Carbs:
4.28 g
Water:
92.52 g
Other:
2.15 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +45.1% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +55.6% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +28.5% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +88.6% |
~equal in
Water
~92.52g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.016 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.018 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.05 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.034 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
Mono. Fat
0.013 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.067 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -52.9% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated Fat | +38.5% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +34% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 16kcal | 19kcal |
|
| Protein | 1.32g | 0.91g |
|
| Fats | 0.09g | 0.14g |
|
| Vitamin C | 9.3mg | 14.7mg |
|
| Net carbs | 1.13g | 1.38g |
|
| Carbs | 3.33g | 4.28g |
|
| Magnesium | 52mg | 13mg |
|
| Calcium | 164mg | 30mg |
|
| Potassium | 257mg | 170mg |
|
| Iron | 0.59mg | 1.47mg |
|
| Sugar | 1.15g | 1.78g |
|
| Fiber | 2.2g | 2.9g |
|
| Copper | 0.052mg | 0.096mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.25mg | 0.19mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 16mg | 20mg |
|
| Sodium | 21mg | 661mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 457IU | 18IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 23µg | 1µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0mg | 0.14mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.457mg | 0.151mg |
|
| Selenium | 0.7µg | 0.6µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.012mg | 0.021mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.041mg | 0.022mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.41mg | 0.143mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.167mg | 0.093mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.07mg | 0.13mg |
|
| Vitamin K | 5.3µg | 13µg |
|
| Folate | 3µg | 24µg |
|
| Choline | 7.3mg | 10.4mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.016g | 0.034g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.018g | 0.013g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.05g | 0.067g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.014mg | 0.008mg |
|
| Threonine | 0.04mg | 0.025mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 0.049mg | 0.021mg |
|
| Leucine | 0.077mg | 0.029mg |
|
| Lysine | 0.059mg | 0.031mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.015mg | 0.009mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.049mg | 0.023mg |
|
| Valine | 0.059mg | 0.03mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.025mg | 0.016mg |
|
| Fructose | 0.04g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
12%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
23%
24%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Nopales is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.63g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Nopales contains less Sodium (difference - 640mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Nopales is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.018g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Nopales is lower in glycemic index (difference - 25)
Which food is cheaper?
Nopales is cheaper (difference - $1)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.