Sugar substitute vs. Kumquat — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are sugar substitute and kumquat different?
- Sugar substitute has more calcium; however, kumquat is richer in fiber, copper, iron, and vitamin B2.
- Sugar substitute covers your daily need for calcium, 82% more than kumquat.
- Sugar substitute has 57 times more sodium than kumquat. Sugar substitute has 572mg of sodium, while kumquat has 10mg.
- Kumquat has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of kumquat is 67, while the glycemic index of sugar substitute is 40.
Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Kumquats, raw types were used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1317.7% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +233.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +376.9% |
| Contains more IronIron | +437.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +1257.1% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +325% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +137.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -98.3% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +513.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +146.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +500% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +160% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +140% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Protein:
1.88 g
Fats:
0.86 g
Carbs:
15.9 g
Water:
80.85 g
Other:
0.51 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +433.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +690.2% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +784.6% |
~equal in
Protein
~1.88g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Calcium | 879mg | 62mg | 82% |
| Vitamin C | 43.9mg | 49% | |
| Sodium | 572mg | 10mg | 24% |
| Fiber | 0.6g | 6.5g | 24% |
| Carbs | 84.77g | 15.9g | 23% |
| Calories | 347kcal | 71kcal | 14% |
| Copper | 0.007mg | 0.095mg | 10% |
| Iron | 0.16mg | 0.86mg | 9% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.09mg | 6% |
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.135mg | 5% |
| Potassium | 39mg | 186mg | 4% |
| Folate | 17µg | 4% | |
| Magnesium | 6mg | 20mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.08mg | 0.208mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.429mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.036mg | 2% |
| Choline | 8.4mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.015mg | 0.037mg | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 8mg | 19mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.15mg | 1% | |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 0.17mg | 1% |
| Fats | 0g | 0.86g | 1% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.171g | 1% | |
| Protein | 2.06g | 1.88g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 84.17g | 9.4g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.03g | 9.36g | N/A |
| Saturated fat | 0.103g | 0% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.154g | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
18%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
14%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Sugar substitute is lower in Sugar (difference - 5.33g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.103g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Sugar substitute is lower in glycemic index (difference - 27)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Kumquat contains less Sodium (difference - 562mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Kumquat is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Kumquat is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)