Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat vs. Kung Pao chicken — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Important differences between tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat and kung Pao chicken

  • Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat has more phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin B2, vitamin B1, fiber, calcium, selenium, and iron; however, kung Pao chicken has more vitamin B3 and vitamin K.
  • Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat's daily need coverage for phosphorus is 32% more.
  • Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat has 8 times more calcium than kung Pao chicken. Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat has 159mg of calcium, while kung Pao chicken has 20mg.

The food varieties used in the comparison are Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat and Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken.

Infographic

Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat vs Kung Pao chicken infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 69% 48% 24% 60% 37% 31% 136% 67% 0% 86%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 17% 6% 19% 29% 24% 20% 40% 52% 33% 44%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +304.2%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +695%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +24.8%
Contains more IronIron +110.5%
Contains more CopperCopper +50.7%
Contains more ZincZinc +55.4%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +238.3%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +93.8%
Contains less SodiumSodium -22.2%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0.67% 1.7% 15% 0% 55% 65% 7.9% 0% 42% 0% 0.5% 12% 12%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 24% 22% 20% 0% 8% 13% 52% 30% 56% 14% 34% 12% 20%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +587.5%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +409.1%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +3450%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +1200%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +32.5%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +556.4%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +35%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +6700%
Contains more CholineCholine +70.8%
~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg
~equal in Folate ~16µg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
11% 6% 80% 2%
Protein: 11 g
Fats: 5.7 g
Carbs: 80 g
Water: 1.7 g
Other: 1.6 g
10% 7% 7% 75%
Protein: 9.76 g
Fats: 6.98 g
Carbs: 6.87 g
Water: 74.78 g
Other: 1.61 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +12.7%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +1064.5%
Contains more FatsFats +22.5%
Contains more WaterWater +4298.8%
~equal in Other ~1.61g

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
16% 31% 53%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.85 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 1.66 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 2.87 g
21% 33% 46%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.352 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 2.173 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 3.02 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -37.1%
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +30.9%
~equal in Polyunsaturated fat ~3.02g

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat Kung Pao chicken
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Rich in vitamins ok
Lower in price Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat Kung Pao chicken DV% diff.
Phosphorus 318mg 94mg 32%
Carbs 80g 6.87g 24%
Vitamin B2 0.28mg 0.055mg 17%
Magnesium 97mg 24mg 17%
Vitamin B1 0.22mg 0.032mg 16%
Vitamin B3 0.42mg 2.757mg 15%
Fiber 5.3g 1.5g 15%
Calories 415kcal 129kcal 14%
Selenium 15.7µg 8.1µg 14%
Calcium 159mg 20mg 14%
Manganese 0.256mg 11%
Iron 1.6mg 0.76mg 11%
Vitamin K 0.2µg 13.6µg 11%
Vitamin B5 0.5mg 10%
Cholesterol 0mg 26mg 9%
Vitamin C 0.2mg 7.1mg 8%
Vitamin A 5µg 65µg 7%
Vitamin B12 0µg 0.11µg 5%
Vitamin B6 0.18mg 0.243mg 5%
Sodium 517mg 402mg 5%
Zinc 1.15mg 0.74mg 4%
Copper 0.11mg 0.073mg 4%
Choline 21.9mg 37.4mg 3%
Protein 11g 9.76g 2%
Saturated fat 0.85g 1.352g 2%
Vitamin E 0.77mg 1.02mg 2%
Fats 5.7g 6.98g 2%
Potassium 272mg 218mg 2%
Fructose 0.54g 1%
Starch 2.53g 1%
Monounsaturated fat 1.66g 2.173g 1%
Polyunsaturated fat 2.87g 3.02g 1%
Net carbs 74.7g 5.37g N/A
Sugar 0.67g 3.03g N/A
Folate 16µg 16µg 0%
Trans fat 0.034g N/A
Tryptophan 0.118mg 0%
Threonine 0.407mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.431mg 0%
Leucine 0.775mg 0%
Lysine 0.449mg 0%
Methionine 0.24mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.402mg 0%
Valine 0.47mg 0%
Histidine 0.265mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - DHA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.244g N/A
Omega-3 - DPA 0g 0.004g N/A
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid 0.002g N/A
Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid 0.005g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.005g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 2.688g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat Kung Pao chicken
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
16%
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
23%
Kung Pao chicken
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
56%
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
29%
Kung Pao chicken

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 26mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is lower in Sugar (difference - 2.36g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.502g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is lower in glycemic index (difference - 55)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat
Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken contains less Sodium (difference - 115mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Tortilla chips, low fat, baked without fat - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/168859/nutrients
  2. Kung Pao chicken - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167676/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.