Absinthe vs. Snickers — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between absinthe and snickers
- Absinthe has less calcium, iron, and fiber.
- Snickers's daily need coverage for saturated fat is 64% more.
- Absinthe is lower in sodium.
- Snickers has a higher glycemic index than absinthe.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Alcoholic beverage, distilled, all (gin, rum, vodka, whiskey) 100 proof and Candies, MARS SNACKFOOD US, SNICKERS CRUNCHER.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +1600% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more WaterWater | +1186.4% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2851.4% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 0g | 12.703g | 58% |
| Fats | 0g | 24.38g | 38% |
| Carbs | 0g | 62.85g | 21% |
| Protein | 0g | 6.86g | 14% |
| Calories | 295kcal | 488kcal | 10% |
| Calcium | 0mg | 90mg | 9% |
| Fiber | 0g | 1.9g | 8% |
| Iron | 0.04mg | 0.68mg | 8% |
| Sodium | 1mg | 189mg | 8% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 9mg | 3% |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.006mg | 1% | |
| Manganese | 0.018mg | 1% | |
| Phosphorus | 4mg | 1% | |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.5mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 60.95g | N/A |
| Potassium | 2mg | 0% | |
| Sugar | 46.54g | N/A | |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.004mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.013mg | 0% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.001mg | 0% | |
| Trans fat | 0g | 0.394g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
0%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
8%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Absinthe is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 9mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Absinthe is lower in Sugar (difference - 46.54g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Absinthe contains less Sodium (difference - 188mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Absinthe is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 12.703g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Absinthe is lower in glycemic index (difference - 51)
Which food is cheaper?
Absinthe is cheaper (difference - $2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Absinthe is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Absinthe is relatively richer in vitamins