Chinese cabbage vs. Hearts of palm — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between Chinese cabbage and hearts of palm?
- Chinese cabbage is higher in vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin B6, and folate, yet hearts of palm are higher in manganese, iron, copper, zinc, and fiber.
- Chinese cabbage's daily need coverage for vitamin A is 89% more.
- Chinese cabbage has 9 times more vitamin B6 than hearts of palm. While Chinese cabbage has 0.194mg of vitamin B6, hearts of palm have only 0.022mg.
- The amount of sodium in Chinese cabbage is lower.
We used Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw and Hearts of palm, canned types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +81% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +42.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -84.7% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +100% |
| Contains more IronIron | +291.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +533.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +505.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +75.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +776.7% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +40% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +469.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +263.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +22.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +14.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +781.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +69.2% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +43.2% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.5 g
Fats:
0.2 g
Carbs:
2.18 g
Water:
95.32 g
Other:
0.8 g
Protein:
2.52 g
Fats:
0.62 g
Carbs:
4.62 g
Water:
90.2 g
Other:
2.04 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +68% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +210% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +111.9% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +155% |
~equal in
Water
~90.2g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.027 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.015 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.096 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.13 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.103 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.202 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -79.2% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +586.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +110.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 0.159mg | 1.394mg | 54% |
| Vitamin C | 45mg | 7.9mg | 41% |
| Vitamin K | 45.5µg | 38% | |
| Iron | 0.8mg | 3.13mg | 29% |
| Vitamin A | 223µg | 0µg | 25% |
| Sodium | 65mg | 426mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.194mg | 0.022mg | 13% |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.133mg | 12% |
| Zinc | 0.19mg | 1.15mg | 9% |
| Folate | 66µg | 39µg | 7% |
| Fiber | 1g | 2.4g | 6% |
| Magnesium | 19mg | 38mg | 5% |
| Calcium | 105mg | 58mg | 5% |
| Phosphorus | 37mg | 65mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.04mg | 0.011mg | 2% |
| Protein | 1.5g | 2.52g | 2% |
| Potassium | 252mg | 177mg | 2% |
| Choline | 6.4mg | 1% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.096g | 0.202g | 1% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.088mg | 0.126mg | 1% |
| Calories | 13kcal | 28kcal | 1% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.07mg | 0.057mg | 1% |
| Carbs | 2.18g | 4.62g | 1% |
| Fats | 0.2g | 0.62g | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.09mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 1.18g | 2.22g | N/A |
| Sugar | 1.18g | N/A | |
| Selenium | 0.5µg | 0.7µg | 0% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.5mg | 0.437mg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.027g | 0.13g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.015g | 0.103g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.015mg | 0.023mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.049mg | 0.097mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.085mg | 0.101mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.088mg | 0.169mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.089mg | 0.091mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.009mg | 0.042mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.044mg | 0.098mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.066mg | 0.114mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.026mg | 0.055mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
37%
7%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
16%
52%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Hearts of palm is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.18g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Hearts of palm is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is cheaper?
Hearts of palm is cheaper (difference - $0.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Hearts of palm is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chinese cabbage contains less Sodium (difference - 361mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chinese cabbage is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.103g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chinese cabbage is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)