Port Salut vs. Halva — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between port Salut and halva
- Port Salut has more calcium and vitamin B12, while halva has more copper, iron, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, and vitamin B1.
- Halva's daily need coverage for copper is 131% higher.
- Port Salut has a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of port Salut is 27, while the glycemic index of halva is 55.
The food types used in this comparison are Cheese, port de salut and Candies, halavah, plain.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1869.7% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +26.1% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +808.3% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +37.5% |
| Contains more IronIron | +953.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +5363.6% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +66.2% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +68.6% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -63.5% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +7836.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +172.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +20.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +3650% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +2928.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +4660% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +556.6% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +261.1% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
23.78 g
Fats:
28.2 g
Carbs:
0.57 g
Water:
45.45 g
Other:
2 g
Protein:
12.49 g
Fats:
21.52 g
Carbs:
60.49 g
Water:
3.67 g
Other:
1.83 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +90.4% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +31% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +1138.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +10512.3% |
~equal in
Other
~1.83g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
16.691 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
9.338 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.729 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
4.127 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.194 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
8.481 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +14% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -75.3% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1063.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Copper | 0.022mg | 1.202mg | 131% |
| Calcium | 650mg | 33mg | 62% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.5µg | 0.04µg | 61% |
| Saturated fat | 16.691g | 4.127g | 57% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.729g | 8.481g | 52% |
| Iron | 0.43mg | 4.53mg | 51% |
| Magnesium | 24mg | 218mg | 46% |
| Cholesterol | 123mg | 0mg | 41% |
| Manganese | 0.011mg | 0.873mg | 37% |
| Vitamin A | 315µg | 0µg | 35% |
| Phosphorus | 360mg | 607mg | 35% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.014mg | 0.424mg | 34% |
| Protein | 23.78g | 12.49g | 23% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.053mg | 0.348mg | 23% |
| Carbs | 0.57g | 60.49g | 20% |
| Fiber | 0g | 4.5g | 18% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.06mg | 2.856mg | 17% |
| Zinc | 2.6mg | 4.32mg | 16% |
| Sodium | 534mg | 195mg | 15% |
| Folate | 18µg | 65µg | 12% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.24mg | 0.088mg | 12% |
| Fats | 28.2g | 21.52g | 10% |
| Calories | 352kcal | 469kcal | 6% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 11.5µg | 5% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 3% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 9.338g | 8.194g | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 21IU | 3% | |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.24mg | 2% | |
| Potassium | 136mg | 187mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.4µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.21mg | 0.174mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.1mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 0.57g | 55.99g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.57g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.343mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.876mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.446mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.482mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.987mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.734mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.323mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.707mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.686mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
32%
25%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
62%
133%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Port Salut is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Halva is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 123mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Halva is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.57g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Halva contains less Sodium (difference - 339mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Halva is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 12.564g)
Which food is cheaper?
Halva is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Halva is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.