Guava vs. Skipjack tuna — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are guava and skipjack tuna different?
- Guava is higher in vitamin C, fiber, and copper; however, skipjack tuna is richer in vitamin B3, vitamin B12, selenium, vitamin B6, phosphorus, and iron.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin C for guava is 253% higher.
- Skipjack tuna has a lower glycemic index (0) than guava (31).
Guavas, common, raw and Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CopperCopper | +109.1% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -95.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +689.5% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +100% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +105.6% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +25.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +515.4% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +356.5% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +612.5% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +7700% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +22730% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +72.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +76.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +390% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +205% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1630.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +791.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.55 g
Fats:
0.95 g
Carbs:
14.32 g
Water:
80.8 g
Other:
1.38 g
Protein:
28.21 g
Fats:
1.29 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
62.28 g
Other:
8.22 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +29.7% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1006.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +35.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +495.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.272 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.087 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.401 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.42 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.243 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.403 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -35.2% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +179.3% |
~equal in
Polyunsaturated fat
~0.403g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin C | 228.3mg | 1mg | 253% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.084mg | 18.756mg | 110% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 2.19µg | 91% |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 46.8µg | 84% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.11mg | 0.981mg | 67% |
| Protein | 2.55g | 28.21g | 51% |
| Phosphorus | 40mg | 285mg | 35% |
| Fiber | 5.4g | 0g | 22% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 60mg | 20% |
| Iron | 0.26mg | 1.6mg | 17% |
| Copper | 0.23mg | 0.11mg | 13% |
| Folate | 49µg | 10µg | 10% |
| Zinc | 0.23mg | 1.05mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.04mg | 0.122mg | 6% |
| Manganese | 0.15mg | 0.019mg | 6% |
| Vitamin E | 0.73mg | 5% | |
| Magnesium | 22mg | 44mg | 5% |
| Carbs | 14.32g | 0g | 5% |
| Calories | 68kcal | 132kcal | 3% |
| Potassium | 417mg | 522mg | 3% |
| Sodium | 2mg | 47mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.067mg | 0.038mg | 2% |
| Calcium | 18mg | 37mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.6µg | 2% | |
| Vitamin A | 31µg | 18µg | 1% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.451mg | 0.485mg | 1% |
| Fats | 0.95g | 1.29g | 1% |
| Choline | 7.6mg | 1% | |
| Saturated fat | 0.272g | 0.42g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 8.92g | 0g | N/A |
| Sugar | 8.92g | N/A | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.087g | 0.243g | 0% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.401g | 0.403g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.022mg | 0.316mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.096mg | 1.237mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.093mg | 1.3mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.171mg | 2.293mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.072mg | 2.59mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.016mg | 0.835mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.006mg | 1.101mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.087mg | 1.453mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.022mg | 0.83mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0g | 0.091g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0g | 0.237g | N/A |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0g | 0.017g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
72%
72%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
19%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Skipjack tuna is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.92g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Skipjack tuna is lower in glycemic index (difference - 31)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Skipjack tuna is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Guava is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 60mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Guava contains less Sodium (difference - 45mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Guava is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.148g)
Which food is cheaper?
Guava is cheaper (difference - $7.5)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.