Hearts of palm vs. Chinese cabbage — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between hearts of palm and Chinese cabbage?
- Hearts of palm are higher in manganese, iron, copper, zinc, and fiber, yet Chinese cabbage is higher in vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin B6, and folate.
- Chinese cabbage's daily need coverage for vitamin A is 89% more.
- Hearts of palm have 9 times more manganese than Chinese cabbage. While hearts of palm have 1.394mg of manganese, Chinese cabbage has only 0.159mg.
- The amount of sodium in Chinese cabbage is lower.
We used Hearts of palm, canned and Cabbage, chinese (pak-choi), raw types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +100% |
| Contains more IronIron | +291.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +533.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +505.3% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +75.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +776.7% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +40% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +81% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +42.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -84.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +43.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +469.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +263.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +22.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +14.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +781.8% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +69.2% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.52 g
Fats:
0.62 g
Carbs:
4.62 g
Water:
90.2 g
Other:
2.04 g
Protein:
1.5 g
Fats:
0.2 g
Carbs:
2.18 g
Water:
95.32 g
Other:
0.8 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +68% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +210% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +111.9% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +155% |
~equal in
Water
~95.32g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.13 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.103 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.202 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.027 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.015 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.096 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +586.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +110.4% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -79.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 1.394mg | 0.159mg | 54% |
| Vitamin C | 7.9mg | 45mg | 41% |
| Vitamin K | 45.5µg | 38% | |
| Iron | 3.13mg | 0.8mg | 29% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 223µg | 25% |
| Sodium | 426mg | 65mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.022mg | 0.194mg | 13% |
| Copper | 0.133mg | 0.021mg | 12% |
| Zinc | 1.15mg | 0.19mg | 9% |
| Folate | 39µg | 66µg | 7% |
| Fiber | 2.4g | 1g | 6% |
| Magnesium | 38mg | 19mg | 5% |
| Calcium | 58mg | 105mg | 5% |
| Phosphorus | 65mg | 37mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.011mg | 0.04mg | 2% |
| Protein | 2.52g | 1.5g | 2% |
| Potassium | 177mg | 252mg | 2% |
| Choline | 6.4mg | 1% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.202g | 0.096g | 1% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.126mg | 0.088mg | 1% |
| Calories | 28kcal | 13kcal | 1% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.057mg | 0.07mg | 1% |
| Carbs | 4.62g | 2.18g | 1% |
| Fats | 0.62g | 0.2g | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.09mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 2.22g | 1.18g | N/A |
| Sugar | 1.18g | N/A | |
| Selenium | 0.7µg | 0.5µg | 0% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.437mg | 0.5mg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.13g | 0.027g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.103g | 0.015g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.023mg | 0.015mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.097mg | 0.049mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.101mg | 0.085mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.169mg | 0.088mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.091mg | 0.089mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.042mg | 0.009mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.098mg | 0.044mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.114mg | 0.066mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.055mg | 0.026mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
7%
37%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
52%
16%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Hearts of palm is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.18g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Hearts of palm is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is cheaper?
Hearts of palm is cheaper (difference - $0.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Hearts of palm is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chinese cabbage contains less Sodium (difference - 361mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chinese cabbage is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.103g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chinese cabbage is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)