Lamb vs. McDonald's Big Mac — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are Lamb and McDonald's Big Mac different?
- Lamb is higher in Vitamin B12, Zinc, Vitamin B3, and Phosphorus, however, McDonald's Big Mac is richer in Calcium, Manganese, and Folate.
- Daily need coverage for Vitamin B12 from Lamb is 70% higher.
- Lamb contains 3 times more Cholesterol than McDonald's Big Mac. While Lamb contains 97mg of Cholesterol, McDonald's Big Mac contains only 36mg.
Lamb, domestic, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked and McDONALD'S, BIG MAC are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+54.1%
Contains
more
Potassium
+71.3%
Contains
less
Sodium
-84.3%
Contains
more
Zinc
+133.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+21.4%
Contains
more
Calcium
+582.4%
Contains
more
Manganese
+836.4%
Equal in Iron - 2
Contains
more
Magnesium
+15%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+54.1%
Contains
more
Potassium
+71.3%
Contains
less
Sodium
-84.3%
Contains
more
Zinc
+133.5%
Contains
more
Copper
+21.4%
Contains
more
Calcium
+582.4%
Contains
more
Manganese
+836.4%
Equal in Iron - 2
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+19.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+96.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+189.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+76%
Contains
more
Folate
+155.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+19.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+96.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+189.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+76%
Contains
more
Folate
+155.6%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+107.4%
Contains
more
Fats
+40%
Contains
more
Carbs
+∞%
Contains
more
Other
+124.4%
Equal in Water - 51.3
Protein:
24.52 g
Fats:
20.94 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
53.72 g
Other:
0.82 g
Protein:
11.82 g
Fats:
14.96 g
Carbs:
20.08 g
Water:
51.3 g
Other:
1.84 g
Contains
more
Protein
+107.4%
Contains
more
Fats
+40%
Contains
more
Carbs
+∞%
Contains
more
Other
+124.4%
Equal in Water - 51.3
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+153.9%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+393.5%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-56.9%
Saturated Fat:
8.83 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
8.82 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
1.51 g
Saturated Fat:
3.803 g
Monounsaturated Fat:
3.474 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
0.306 g
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+153.9%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+393.5%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-56.9%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 0g | 18.48g |
|
| Protein | 24.52g | 11.82g |
|
| Fats | 20.94g | 14.96g |
|
| Carbs | 0g | 20.08g |
|
| Calories | 294kcal | 257kcal |
|
| Fructose | 1.69g |
|
|
| Sugar | 0g | 3.97g |
|
| Fiber | 0g | 1.6g |
|
| Calcium | 17mg | 116mg |
|
| Iron | 1.88mg | 2mg |
|
| Magnesium | 23mg | 20mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 188mg | 122mg |
|
| Potassium | 310mg | 181mg |
|
| Sodium | 72mg | 460mg |
|
| Zinc | 4.46mg | 1.91mg |
|
| Copper | 0.119mg | 0.098mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.206mg |
|
| Selenium | 26.4µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 0IU | 188IU |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.14mg |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 2IU |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0.1µg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.4mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.1mg | 0.176mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.25mg | 0.209mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 6.66mg | 3.384mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.66mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.13mg |
|
|
| Folate | 18µg | 46µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 2.55µg | 0.88µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 4.6µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.287mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 1.05mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 1.183mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 1.908mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 2.166mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.629mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.998mg |
|
|
| Valine | 1.323mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.777mg |
|
|
| Cholesterol | 97mg | 36mg |
|
| Trans Fat | 0.588g |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 8.83g | 3.803g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 8.82g | 3.474g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1.51g | 0.306g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
52%
26%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
52%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
McDonald's Big Mac is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 61mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
McDonald's Big Mac is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 5.027g)
Which food is cheaper?
McDonald's Big Mac is cheaper (difference - $2.3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Lamb is lower in Sugar (difference - 3.97g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Lamb contains less Sodium (difference - 388mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Lamb is lower in glycemic index (difference - 66)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Lamb is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.