Ling fish vs. Atlantic Mackerel — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Ling fish and Atlantic Mackerel
- Ling fish is richer in Copper, Phosphorus, and Potassium, yet Atlantic Mackerel is richer in Vitamin B12, Vitamin B3, Iron, Vitamin B5, and Vitamin B2.
- Daily need coverage for Vitamin B12 from Atlantic Mackerel is 336% higher.
- Ling fish contains 2 times more Copper than Atlantic Mackerel. Ling fish contains 0.141mg of Copper, while Atlantic Mackerel contains 0.073mg.
- Ling fish contains less Cholesterol.
Food types used in this article are Fish, ling, cooked, dry heat and Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Calcium
+266.7%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+17.1%
Contains
more
Potassium
+54.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+58.7%
Contains
more
Copper
+93.2%
Contains
more
Manganese
+153.3%
Contains
more
Iron
+96.4%
Contains
less
Sodium
-48%
Equal in Magnesium - 76
Equal in Selenium - 44.1
Contains
more
Calcium
+266.7%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+17.1%
Contains
more
Potassium
+54.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+58.7%
Contains
more
Copper
+93.2%
Contains
more
Manganese
+153.3%
Contains
more
Iron
+96.4%
Contains
less
Sodium
-48%
Equal in Magnesium - 76
Equal in Selenium - 44.1
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Folate
+700%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+45.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+38.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+35.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+224.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+132%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+13.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+1240%
Contains
more
Folate
+700%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+45.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+38.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+35.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+224.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+132%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+13.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+1240%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+30.9%
Contains
more
Water
+16.3%
Contains
more
Fats
+1593.9%
Contains
more
Other
+316.8%
Protein:
24.35 g
Fats:
0.82 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
73.88 g
Other:
0.95 g
Protein:
18.6 g
Fats:
13.89 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
63.55 g
Other:
3.96 g
Contains
more
Protein
+30.9%
Contains
more
Water
+16.3%
Contains
more
Fats
+1593.9%
Contains
more
Other
+316.8%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Protein | 24.35g | 18.6g |
|
| Fats | 0.82g | 13.89g |
|
| Calories | 111kcal | 205kcal |
|
| Calcium | 44mg | 12mg |
|
| Iron | 0.83mg | 1.63mg |
|
| Magnesium | 81mg | 76mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 254mg | 217mg |
|
| Potassium | 486mg | 314mg |
|
| Sodium | 173mg | 90mg |
|
| Zinc | 1mg | 0.63mg |
|
| Copper | 0.141mg | 0.073mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.015mg |
|
| Selenium | 46.8µg | 44.1µg |
|
| Vitamin A | 115IU | 167IU |
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 35µg | 50µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 1.52mg |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 643IU |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 16.1µg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.4mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.127mg | 0.176mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.231mg | 0.312mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 2.801mg | 9.08mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.369mg | 0.856mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.351mg | 0.399mg |
|
| Folate | 8µg | 1µg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0.65µg | 8.71µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 5µg |
|
|
| Tryptophan | 0.273mg | 0.208mg |
|
| Threonine | 1.067mg | 0.815mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.122mg | 0.857mg |
|
| Leucine | 1.979mg | 1.512mg |
|
| Lysine | 2.236mg | 1.708mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.721mg | 0.551mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.95mg | 0.726mg |
|
| Valine | 1.254mg | 0.958mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.717mg | 0.548mg |
|
| Cholesterol | 51mg | 70mg |
|
| Saturated Fat | 3.257g |
|
|
| Omega-3 - DHA | 1.401g |
|
|
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.898g |
|
|
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.212g |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 5.456g |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 3.35g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet | Equal | |
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
28%
171%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
61%
54%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Ling fish is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Ling fish is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 19mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Ling fish is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 3.257g)
Which food is cheaper?
Ling fish is cheaper (difference - $7)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Ling fish is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Atlantic Mackerel contains less Sodium (difference - 83mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Atlantic Mackerel is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Atlantic Mackerel is relatively richer in vitamins