Raspberry vs. Tomato — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Differences between Raspberry and Tomato
- Tomato contains less Manganese, Fiber, Vitamin C, and Iron than Raspberry.
- Raspberry's daily need coverage for Manganese is 24% higher.
- Tomato contains 5 times less Fiber than Raspberry. Raspberry contains 6.5g of Fiber, while Tomato contains 1.2g.
- The amount of Sugar in Tomato is lower.
The food types used in this comparison are Raspberries, raw and Tomatoes, red, ripe, raw, year round average.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Calcium
+150%
Contains
more
Iron
+155.6%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+20.8%
Contains
less
Sodium
-80%
Contains
more
Zinc
+147.1%
Contains
more
Copper
+52.5%
Contains
more
Manganese
+487.7%
Contains
more
Selenium
+∞%
Contains
more
Potassium
+57%
Contains
more
Calcium
+150%
Contains
more
Iron
+155.6%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+100%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+20.8%
Contains
less
Sodium
-80%
Contains
more
Zinc
+147.1%
Contains
more
Copper
+52.5%
Contains
more
Manganese
+487.7%
Contains
more
Selenium
+∞%
Contains
more
Potassium
+57%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+61.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+91.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+269.7%
Contains
more
Folate
+40%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+2424.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+15.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+45.5%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 0.594
Equal in Vitamin K - 7.9
Contains
more
Vitamin E
+61.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+91.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+269.7%
Contains
more
Folate
+40%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+2424.2%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+15.6%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+45.5%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 0.594
Equal in Vitamin K - 7.9
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+36.4%
Contains
more
Fats
+225%
Contains
more
Carbs
+206.9%
Contains
more
Water
+10.2%
Contains
more
Other
+10.9%
Contains
more
Protein
+36.4%
Contains
more
Fats
+225%
Contains
more
Carbs
+206.9%
Contains
more
Water
+10.2%
Contains
more
Other
+10.9%
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-32.1%
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+106.5%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+351.8%
Contains
less
Saturated Fat
-32.1%
Contains
more
Monounsaturated Fat
+106.5%
Contains
more
Polyunsaturated fat
+351.8%
Carbohydrate type comparison
Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Sucrose
+∞%
Contains
more
Glucose
+48.8%
Contains
more
Fructose
+71.5%
Contains
more
Sucrose
+∞%
Contains
more
Glucose
+48.8%
Contains
more
Fructose
+71.5%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 5.44g | 2.69g |
|
| Protein | 1.2g | 0.88g |
|
| Fats | 0.65g | 0.2g |
|
| Carbs | 11.94g | 3.89g |
|
| Calories | 52kcal | 18kcal |
|
| Fructose | 2.35g | 1.37g |
|
| Sugar | 4.42g | 2.63g |
|
| Fiber | 6.5g | 1.2g |
|
| Calcium | 25mg | 10mg |
|
| Iron | 0.69mg | 0.27mg |
|
| Magnesium | 22mg | 11mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 29mg | 24mg |
|
| Potassium | 151mg | 237mg |
|
| Sodium | 1mg | 5mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.42mg | 0.17mg |
|
| Copper | 0.09mg | 0.059mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.67mg | 0.114mg |
|
| Selenium | 0.2µg | 0µg |
|
| Vitamin A | 33IU | 833IU |
|
| Vitamin A RAE | 2µg | 42µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.87mg | 0.54mg |
|
| Vitamin C | 26.2mg | 13.7mg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.032mg | 0.037mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.038mg | 0.019mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.598mg | 0.594mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.329mg | 0.089mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.055mg | 0.08mg |
|
| Folate | 21µg | 15µg |
|
| Vitamin K | 7.8µg | 7.9µg |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.006mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.027mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.018mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.025mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.027mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.006mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.027mg |
|
|
| Valine | 0.018mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.014mg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.019g | 0.028g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.064g | 0.031g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.375g | 0.083g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
17%
16%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
20%
9%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tomato is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.79g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Tomato is lower in glycemic index (difference - 3)
Which food is cheaper?
Tomato is cheaper (difference - $0.3)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Raspberry contains less Sodium (difference - 4mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Raspberry is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.009g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Raspberry is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.