Cauliflower vs. Succotash — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between cauliflower and succotash
- Cauliflower has more vitamin C and vitamin B5; however, succotash is richer in manganese, iron, copper, vitamin B1, phosphorus, magnesium, fiber, and vitamin B3.
- Cauliflower covers your daily vitamin C needs 37% more than succotash.
- Succotash has 5 times less vitamin B5 than cauliflower. Cauliflower has 0.667mg of vitamin B5, while succotash has 0.128mg.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Cauliflower, raw and Succotash, (corn and limas), raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +22.2% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +220% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +23.4% |
| Contains more IronIron | +335.7% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +376.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +125.9% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +156.8% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -86.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +343.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +219.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +421.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +41.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +42.5% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +316% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +36.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +213% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
1.92 g
Fats:
0.28 g
Carbs:
4.97 g
Water:
92.07 g
Other:
0.76 g
Protein:
5.03 g
Fats:
1.02 g
Carbs:
19.59 g
Water:
73.1 g
Other:
1.26 g
| Contains more WaterWater | +26% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +162% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +264.3% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +294.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +65.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.13 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.034 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.031 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.19 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.198 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.489 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -31.6% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +482.4% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1477.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin C | 48.2mg | 15.1mg | 37% |
| Manganese | 0.155mg | 0.688mg | 23% |
| Iron | 0.42mg | 1.83mg | 18% |
| Copper | 0.039mg | 0.186mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05mg | 0.208mg | 13% |
| Vitamin K | 15.5µg | 13% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.667mg | 0.128mg | 11% |
| Phosphorus | 44mg | 113mg | 10% |
| Choline | 44.3mg | 8% | |
| Magnesium | 15mg | 48mg | 8% |
| Fiber | 2g | 3.8g | 7% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.507mg | 1.587mg | 7% |
| Protein | 1.92g | 5.03g | 6% |
| Carbs | 4.97g | 19.59g | 5% |
| Folate | 57µg | 40µg | 4% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.184mg | 0.13mg | 4% |
| Calories | 25kcal | 99kcal | 4% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.031g | 0.489g | 3% |
| Zinc | 0.27mg | 0.61mg | 3% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.06mg | 0.082mg | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 15µg | 2% |
| Potassium | 299mg | 369mg | 2% |
| Fructose | 0.97g | 1% | |
| Sodium | 30mg | 4mg | 1% |
| Fats | 0.28g | 1.02g | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.08mg | 1% | |
| Net carbs | 2.97g | 15.79g | N/A |
| Calcium | 22mg | 18mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 1.91g | N/A | |
| Selenium | 0.6µg | 0.6µg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.13g | 0.19g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.034g | 0.198g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.02mg | 0.056mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.076mg | 0.209mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.071mg | 0.284mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.106mg | 0.443mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.217mg | 0.295mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.02mg | 0.068mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.065mg | 0.243mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.125mg | 0.306mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.056mg | 0.16mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.015g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.013g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
30%
17%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
13%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Succotash is lower in Sugar (difference - 1.91g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Succotash contains less Sodium (difference - 26mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 0)
Which food is cheaper?
Succotash is cheaper (difference - $0.4)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Cauliflower is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.06g)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.