Heart of palm vs Cranberry bean - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Potassium
+35.6%
Contains
more
Iron
+195.9%
Contains
more
Calcium
+605.6%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+1460%
Contains
more
Copper
+23.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+165.7%
Contains
less
Sodium
-57.1%
Equal in Zinc - 3.63
Contains
more
Potassium
+35.6%
Contains
more
Iron
+195.9%
Contains
more
Calcium
+605.6%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+1460%
Contains
more
Copper
+23.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+165.7%
Contains
less
Sodium
-57.1%
Equal in Zinc - 3.63
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+3300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+162.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+1394%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+18.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+61.7%
Contains
more
Folate, total
+2416.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin A
+3300%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+162.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+1394%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+18.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin B3
+61.7%
Contains
more
Folate, total
+2416.7%
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
19
56
Mineral Summary Score
51
82
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
16%
138%
Carbohydrates
26%
60%
Fats
1%
6%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Heart of palm is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.27g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Heart of palm is lower in glycemic index (difference - 3)
Which food is cheaper?
Heart of palm is cheaper (difference - $2.4)
Which food contains less Sugars?
Cranberry bean contains less Sugars (difference - 17.16g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cranberry bean contains less Sodium (difference - 8mg)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in minerals. See charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in vitamins. See charts below for detailed information.
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 115 | 335 |
|
| Protein | 2.7 | 23.03 |
|
| Fats | 0.2 | 1.23 |
|
| Vitamin C | 8 | 0 |
|
| Carbs | 25.61 | 60.05 |
|
| Cholesterol | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Iron | 1.69 | 5 |
|
| Calcium | 18 | 127 |
|
| Potassium | 1806 | 1332 |
|
| Magnesium | 10 | 156 |
|
| Sugars | 17.16 |
|
|
| Fiber | 1.5 | 24.7 |
|
| Copper | 0.644 | 0.794 |
|
| Zinc | 3.73 | 3.63 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 140 | 372 |
|
| Sodium | 14 | 6 |
|
| Vitamin A | 68 | 2 |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.5 |
|
|
| Vitamin D | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.05 | 0.747 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.18 | 0.213 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.9 | 1.455 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.748 |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.81 | 0.309 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin K | 0 |
|
|
| Folate, total | 24 | 604 |
|
| Folic acid (B9) | 0 | 0 | |
| Trans Fat | 0 | 0 | |
| Saturated Fat | 0.046 | 0.316 |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.005 | 0.106 |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.089 | 0.527 |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.273 |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.969 |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 1.017 |
|
|
| Leucine | 1.838 |
|
|
| Lysine | 1.58 |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.346 |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.245 |
|
|
| Valine | 1.205 |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.641 |
|
|
| Fructose |