Juice vs. Béchamel sauce — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between juice and béchamel sauce
- Juice has more vitamin B6, vitamin B3, vitamin B1, vitamin B2, and vitamin C; however, béchamel sauce is higher in phosphorus, vitamin B12, and calcium.
- Juice covers your daily vitamin B6 needs 35% more than béchamel sauce.
- Béchamel sauce contains 19 times less vitamin B3 than juice. Juice contains 5mg of vitamin B3, while béchamel sauce contains 0.261mg.
- Juice has less sodium.
Food varieties used in this article are Beverages, Orange juice drink and Sauce, homemade, white, thin.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CopperCopper | +38.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.4% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +400% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +6200% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +288.1% |
| Contains more IronIron | +90.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2000% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2425% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +242.9% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +1775% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +590.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +133.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1815.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1119.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +3550% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +750% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +465% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +125% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0.2 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
13.41 g
Water:
86.2 g
Other:
0.19 g
Protein:
3.77 g
Fats:
6.73 g
Carbs:
7.4 g
Water:
80.66 g
Other:
1.44 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +81.2% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1785% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +657.9% |
~equal in
Water
~80.66g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.01 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.01 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.152 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.67 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.586 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -100% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +26600% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +15760% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.5mg | 0.041mg | 35% |
| Vitamin B3 | 5mg | 0.261mg | 30% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.38mg | 0.055mg | 27% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.43mg | 0.184mg | 19% |
| Vitamin C | 15mg | 0.8mg | 16% |
| Sodium | 2mg | 328mg | 14% |
| Phosphorus | 4mg | 101mg | 14% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0µg | 0.3µg | 13% |
| Calcium | 2mg | 126mg | 12% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.01g | 1.586g | 11% |
| Saturated fat | 0g | 2.152g | 10% |
| Fats | 0g | 6.73g | 10% |
| Vitamin A | 2µg | 73µg | 8% |
| Protein | 0.2g | 3.77g | 7% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.01g | 2.67g | 7% |
| Vitamin D | 49IU | 6% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.06mg | 0.339mg | 6% |
| Vitamin D | 1.2µg | 6% | |
| Selenium | 0µg | 3.3µg | 6% |
| Potassium | 42mg | 163mg | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.02mg | 0.42mg | 4% |
| Choline | 14.1mg | 3% | |
| Calories | 54kcal | 105kcal | 3% |
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 8mg | 3% |
| Magnesium | 3mg | 15mg | 3% |
| Carbs | 13.41g | 7.4g | 2% |
| Folate | 4µg | 9µg | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.02mg | 0.17mg | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.007mg | 0.024mg | 1% |
| Vitamin K | 0µg | 0.6µg | 1% |
| Iron | 0.11mg | 0.21mg | 1% |
| Copper | 0.018mg | 0.013mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 13.21g | 7.3g | N/A |
| Sugar | 9.36g | 4.78g | N/A |
| Fiber | 0.2g | 0.1g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.046mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.147mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.198mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.32mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.259mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.082mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.157mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.219mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.089mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
35%
15%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
2%
19%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Juice is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 8mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Juice contains less Sodium (difference - 326mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Juice is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 2.152g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Béchamel sauce is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.58g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Béchamel sauce is lower in glycemic index (difference - 50)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Béchamel sauce is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.