Kumquat vs. Succotash — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between kumquat and succotash
- Kumquat is richer in vitamin C and fiber, yet succotash is richer in manganese, vitamin B1, phosphorus, iron, copper, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, and magnesium.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin C for kumquat is 32% higher.
- Kumquat contains 2 times more fiber than succotash. Kumquat contains 6.5g of fiber, while succotash contains 3.8g.
Food types used in this article are Kumquats, raw and Succotash, (corn and limas), raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +244.4% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +140% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +98.4% |
| Contains more IronIron | +112.8% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +95.8% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +258.8% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +494.7% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -60% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +409.6% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +190.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +62.5% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +462.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +269.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +261.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +135.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +167.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +18.6% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +23.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +147.1% |
~equal in
Water
~73.1g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -45.8% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +28.6% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +186% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin C | 43.9mg | 15.1mg | 32% |
| Manganese | 0.135mg | 0.688mg | 24% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.037mg | 0.208mg | 14% |
| Phosphorus | 19mg | 113mg | 13% |
| Iron | 0.86mg | 1.83mg | 12% |
| Fiber | 6.5g | 3.8g | 11% |
| Copper | 0.095mg | 0.186mg | 10% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.036mg | 0.13mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.429mg | 1.587mg | 7% |
| Magnesium | 20mg | 48mg | 7% |
| Protein | 1.88g | 5.03g | 6% |
| Folate | 17µg | 40µg | 6% |
| Potassium | 186mg | 369mg | 5% |
| Calcium | 62mg | 18mg | 4% |
| Zinc | 0.17mg | 0.61mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.208mg | 0.128mg | 2% |
| Choline | 8.4mg | 2% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.171g | 0.489g | 2% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.09mg | 0.082mg | 1% |
| Calories | 71kcal | 99kcal | 1% |
| Selenium | 0µg | 0.6µg | 1% |
| Vitamin E | 0.15mg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 15.9g | 19.59g | 1% |
| Fats | 0.86g | 1.02g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 9.4g | 15.79g | N/A |
| Sugar | 9.36g | N/A | |
| Sodium | 10mg | 4mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 15µg | 15µg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.103g | 0.19g | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.154g | 0.198g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.056mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.209mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.284mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.443mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.295mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.068mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.243mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.306mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.16mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
18%
17%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
14%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Succotash is lower in Sugar (difference - 9.36g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Succotash contains less Sodium (difference - 6mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Succotash is lower in glycemic index (difference - 67)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Succotash is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Kumquat is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.087g)
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.