Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Cashew — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Differences between Limburger and Cashew

  • Limburger has more Calcium, Vitamin B12, Vitamin A RAE, and Vitamin B2, while Cashew has more Copper, Iron, Manganese, and Magnesium.
  • Cashew's daily need coverage for Copper is 242% higher.
  • The amount of Sodium in Cashew is lower.

The food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Nuts, cashew nuts, raw.

Infographic

Limburger vs Cashew infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Calcium +1243.2%
Contains more Iron +5038.5%
Contains more Magnesium +1290.5%
Contains more Phosphorus +50.9%
Contains more Potassium +415.6%
Contains less Sodium -98.5%
Contains more Zinc +175.2%
Contains more Copper +10352.4%
Contains more Manganese +4255.3%
Contains more Selenium +37.2%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 150% 5% 15% 169% 12% 105% 58% 7% 5% 80%
Calcium Iron Magnesium Phosphorus Potassium Sodium Zinc Copper Manganese Selenium 12% 251% 209% 255% 59% 2% 158% 732% 216% 109%
Contains more Calcium +1243.2%
Contains more Iron +5038.5%
Contains more Magnesium +1290.5%
Contains more Phosphorus +50.9%
Contains more Potassium +415.6%
Contains less Sodium -98.5%
Contains more Zinc +175.2%
Contains more Copper +10352.4%
Contains more Manganese +4255.3%
Contains more Selenium +37.2%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
6
Cashew
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +767.2%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +36.2%
Contains more Folate +132%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +291.3%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +428.8%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +572.2%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +384.9%
Contains more Vitamin K +1382.6%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 70% 5% 15% 0% 20% 117% 3% 71% 20% 44% 130% 6%
Vitamin A Vitamin E Vitamin D Vitamin C Vitamin B1 Vitamin B2 Vitamin B3 Vitamin B5 Vitamin B6 Folate Vitamin B12 Vitamin K 0% 19% 0% 2% 106% 14% 20% 52% 97% 19% 0% 86%
Contains more Vitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B2 +767.2%
Contains more Vitamin B5 +36.2%
Contains more Folate +132%
Contains more Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more Vitamin E +291.3%
Contains more Vitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1 +428.8%
Contains more Vitamin B3 +572.2%
Contains more Vitamin B6 +384.9%
Contains more Vitamin K +1382.6%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains more Water +831.2%
Contains more Other +49.2%
Contains more Fats +60.9%
Contains more Carbs +6061.2%
Equal in Protein - 18.22
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
18% 44% 30% 5% 3%
Protein: 18.22 g
Fats: 43.85 g
Carbs: 30.19 g
Water: 5.2 g
Other: 2.54 g
Contains more Water +831.2%
Contains more Other +49.2%
Contains more Fats +60.9%
Contains more Carbs +6061.2%
Equal in Protein - 18.22

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains less Saturated Fat -53.5%
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +176.5%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +1484.8%
65% 33% 2%
Saturated Fat: 16.746 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 0.495 g
20% 60% 20%
Saturated Fat: 7.783 g
Monounsaturated Fat: 23.797 g
Polyunsaturated fat: 7.845 g
Contains less Saturated Fat -53.5%
Contains more Monounsaturated Fat +176.5%
Contains more Polyunsaturated fat +1484.8%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Cashew
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Saturated Fat ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals ok
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Cashew Opinion
Net carbs 0.49g 26.89g Cashew
Protein 20.05g 18.22g Limburger
Fats 27.25g 43.85g Cashew
Carbs 0.49g 30.19g Cashew
Calories 327kcal 553kcal Cashew
Starch 23.49g Cashew
Fructose 0.05g Cashew
Sugar 0.49g 5.91g Limburger
Fiber 0g 3.3g Cashew
Calcium 497mg 37mg Limburger
Iron 0.13mg 6.68mg Cashew
Magnesium 21mg 292mg Cashew
Phosphorus 393mg 593mg Cashew
Potassium 128mg 660mg Cashew
Sodium 800mg 12mg Cashew
Zinc 2.1mg 5.78mg Cashew
Copper 0.021mg 2.195mg Cashew
Manganese 0.038mg 1.655mg Cashew
Selenium 14.5µg 19.9µg Cashew
Vitamin A 1155IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin A RAE 340µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin E 0.23mg 0.9mg Cashew
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU Limburger
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin C 0mg 0.5mg Cashew
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.423mg Cashew
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.058mg Limburger
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 1.062mg Cashew
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.864mg Limburger
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.417mg Cashew
Folate 58µg 25µg Limburger
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0µg Limburger
Vitamin K 2.3µg 34.1µg Cashew
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.287mg Limburger
Threonine 0.739mg 0.688mg Limburger
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.789mg Limburger
Leucine 2.093mg 1.472mg Limburger
Lysine 1.675mg 0.928mg Limburger
Methionine 0.619mg 0.362mg Limburger
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.951mg Limburger
Valine 1.439mg 1.094mg Limburger
Histidine 0.578mg 0.456mg Limburger
Cholesterol 90mg 0mg Cashew
Saturated Fat 16.746g 7.783g Cashew
Monounsaturated Fat 8.606g 23.797g Cashew
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 7.845g Cashew

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Cashew
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Calories diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
41%
Limburger
34%
Cashew
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
200%
Cashew

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 5.42g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cashew
Cashew contains less Sodium (difference - 788mg)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Cashew
Cashew is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Cashew
Cashew is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 8.963g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Cashew
Cashew is lower in glycemic index (difference - 2)
Which food is cheaper?
Cashew
Cashew is cheaper (difference - $0.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Cashew
Cashew is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Cashew - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170162/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.