Limburger vs. Ginger ale — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between Limburger and ginger ale
- The amount of phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, selenium, vitamin B5, and vitamin A in Limburger is higher than in ginger ale.
- Limburger covers your daily saturated fat needs 84% more than ginger ale.
- Ginger ale contains less saturated fat.
- Ginger ale has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of ginger ale is 63, while the glycemic index of Limburger is 27.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Cheese, limburger and Beverages, carbonated, ginger ale.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +2000% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +16466.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +12700% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +16.7% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +4100% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +192.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +14400% |
| Contains more IronIron | +38.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.1% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
20.05 g
Fats:
27.25 g
Carbs:
0.49 g
Water:
48.42 g
Other:
3.79 g
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
8.76 g
Water:
91.23 g
Other:
0.01 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +37800% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +1687.8% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +88.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 16.746g | 0g | 76% |
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 0mg | 56% |
| Calcium | 497mg | 3mg | 49% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 0µg | 43% |
| Fats | 27.25g | 0g | 42% |
| Protein | 20.05g | 0g | 40% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0mg | 39% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 0µg | 38% |
| Sodium | 800mg | 7mg | 34% |
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 0mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 0.1µg | 26% |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0mg | 24% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 0g | 22% |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0.05mg | 19% |
| Folate | 58µg | 0µg | 15% |
| Calories | 327kcal | 34kcal | 15% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0mg | 7% |
| Fructose | 3.7g | 5% | |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 1mg | 5% |
| Potassium | 128mg | 1mg | 4% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 0g | 3% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 0mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 0IU | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 0µg | 3% |
| Carbs | 0.49g | 8.76g | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 0mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 0µg | 2% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 0mg | 1% |
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.18mg | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.013mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 8.76g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0.49g | 8.9g | N/A |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.018mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
0%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
2%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.41g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 36)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Ginger ale is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Ginger ale contains less Sodium (difference - 793mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Ginger ale is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.746g)
Which food is cheaper?
Ginger ale is cheaper (difference - $2.4)