Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Limburger vs. Kung Pao chicken — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Summary of differences between Limburger and kung Pao chicken

  • Limburger has more calcium, phosphorus, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, vitamin B5, and zinc; however, kung Pao chicken is higher in vitamin B3.
  • Limburger covers your daily need for saturated fat, 77% more than kung Pao chicken.
  • Limburger has 25 times more calcium than kung Pao chicken. While Limburger has 497mg of calcium, kung Pao chicken has only 20mg.
  • Kung Pao chicken has less saturated fat.
  • The glycemic index of kung Pao chicken is higher.

These are the specific foods used in this comparison Cheese, limburger and Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken.

Infographic

Limburger vs Kung Pao chicken infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 15% 149% 11% 4.9% 7% 57% 168% 104% 5% 79%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 17% 6% 19% 29% 24% 20% 40% 52% 33% 44%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +2385%
Contains more ZincZinc +183.8%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +318.1%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +79%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +14.3%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +70.3%
Contains more IronIron +484.6%
Contains more CopperCopper +247.6%
Contains less SodiumSodium -49.8%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +573.7%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 113% 4.6% 7.5% 20% 116% 3% 71% 20% 130% 5.8% 44% 8.4%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 24% 22% 20% 0% 8% 13% 52% 30% 56% 14% 34% 12% 20%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +423.1%
Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +150%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +814.5%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +135.4%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +845.5%
Contains more FolateFolate +262.5%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +343.5%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +1644.9%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +182.6%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +491.3%
Contains more CholineCholine +142.9%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
20% 27% 48% 4%
Protein: 20.05 g
Fats: 27.25 g
Carbs: 0.49 g
Water: 48.42 g
Other: 3.79 g
10% 7% 7% 75%
Protein: 9.76 g
Fats: 6.98 g
Carbs: 6.87 g
Water: 74.78 g
Other: 1.61 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +105.4%
Contains more FatsFats +290.4%
Contains more OtherOther +135.4%
Contains more CarbsCarbs +1302%
Contains more WaterWater +54.4%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
65% 33% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 16.746 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 8.606 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.495 g
21% 33% 46%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 1.352 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 2.173 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 3.02 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +296%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -91.9%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +510.1%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Limburger Kung Pao chicken
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Rich in minerals Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Limburger Kung Pao chicken DV% diff.
Saturated fat 16.746g 1.352g 70%
Calcium 497mg 20mg 48%
Phosphorus 393mg 94mg 43%
Vitamin B12 1.04µg 0.11µg 39%
Vitamin B2 0.503mg 0.055mg 34%
Fats 27.25g 6.98g 31%
Vitamin A 340µg 65µg 31%
Cholesterol 90mg 26mg 21%
Protein 20.05g 9.76g 21%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.495g 3.02g 17%
Sodium 800mg 402mg 17%
Monounsaturated fat 8.606g 2.173g 16%
Vitamin B3 0.158mg 2.757mg 16%
Vitamin B5 1.177mg 0.5mg 14%
Vitamin B6 0.086mg 0.243mg 12%
Selenium 14.5µg 8.1µg 12%
Zinc 2.1mg 0.74mg 12%
Folate 58µg 16µg 11%
Calories 327kcal 129kcal 10%
Vitamin K 2.3µg 13.6µg 9%
Manganese 0.038mg 0.256mg 9%
Vitamin C 0mg 7.1mg 8%
Iron 0.13mg 0.76mg 8%
Copper 0.021mg 0.073mg 6%
Fiber 0g 1.5g 6%
Vitamin E 0.23mg 1.02mg 5%
Vitamin B1 0.08mg 0.032mg 4%
Choline 15.4mg 37.4mg 4%
Vitamin D 20IU 0IU 3%
Potassium 128mg 218mg 3%
Vitamin D 0.5µg 0µg 3%
Carbs 0.49g 6.87g 2%
Magnesium 21mg 24mg 1%
Fructose 0.54g 1%
Starch 2.53g 1%
Net carbs 0.49g 5.37g N/A
Sugar 0.49g 3.03g N/A
Trans fat 0.034g N/A
Tryptophan 0.289mg 0.118mg 0%
Threonine 0.739mg 0.407mg 0%
Isoleucine 1.219mg 0.431mg 0%
Leucine 2.093mg 0.775mg 0%
Lysine 1.675mg 0.449mg 0%
Methionine 0.619mg 0.24mg 0%
Phenylalanine 1.116mg 0.402mg 0%
Valine 1.439mg 0.47mg 0%
Histidine 0.578mg 0.265mg 0%
Omega-3 - EPA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - DHA 0g 0.003g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.244g N/A
Omega-3 - DPA 0g 0.004g N/A
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid 0.002g N/A
Omega-6 - Dihomo-gamma-linoleic acid 0.005g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.005g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 2.688g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Limburger Kung Pao chicken
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
Limburger
23%
Kung Pao chicken
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
Limburger
29%
Kung Pao chicken

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 2.54g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 64mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken contains less Sodium (difference - 398mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 15.394g)
Which food is cheaper?
Kung Pao chicken
Kung Pao chicken is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Limburger - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/171243/nutrients
  2. Kung Pao chicken - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167676/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.