Limburger vs. Orange — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Limburger and oranges
- Limburger has more phosphorus, calcium, vitamin B12, vitamin B2, selenium, and vitamin A; however, oranges have more vitamin C.
- Daily need coverage for saturated fat for Limburger is 84% higher.
- Oranges are lower in sodium.
- Oranges have a higher glycemic index than Limburger.
Food types used in this article are Cheese, limburger and Oranges, raw, all commercial varieties.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +110% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +1142.5% |
| Contains more IronIron | +30% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2900% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +2707.1% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +52% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +2800% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +41.4% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +114.3% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +2990.9% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +27.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin DVitamin D | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +1157.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +370.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +43.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +93.3% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +83.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +78.5% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +2033% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +22608.3% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +761.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +2298% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +79.2% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +37317.4% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1880% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -99.9% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Saturated fat | 16.746g | 0.015g | 76% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 53.2mg | 59% |
| Phosphorus | 393mg | 14mg | 54% |
| Calcium | 497mg | 40mg | 46% |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.04µg | 0µg | 43% |
| Fats | 27.25g | 0.12g | 42% |
| Protein | 20.05g | 0.94g | 38% |
| Vitamin A | 340µg | 11µg | 37% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.503mg | 0.04mg | 36% |
| Sodium | 800mg | 0mg | 35% |
| Cholesterol | 90mg | 0mg | 30% |
| Selenium | 14.5µg | 0.5µg | 25% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 8.606g | 0.023g | 21% |
| Vitamin B5 | 1.177mg | 0.25mg | 19% |
| Zinc | 2.1mg | 0.07mg | 18% |
| Calories | 327kcal | 47kcal | 14% |
| Fiber | 0g | 2.4g | 10% |
| Folate | 58µg | 30µg | 7% |
| Carbs | 0.49g | 11.75g | 4% |
| Magnesium | 21mg | 10mg | 3% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.495g | 0.025g | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 20IU | 0IU | 3% |
| Copper | 0.021mg | 0.045mg | 3% |
| Vitamin D | 0.5µg | 0µg | 3% |
| Potassium | 128mg | 181mg | 2% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.086mg | 0.06mg | 2% |
| Vitamin K | 2.3µg | 0µg | 2% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.08mg | 0.087mg | 1% |
| Choline | 15.4mg | 8.4mg | 1% |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.158mg | 0.282mg | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.038mg | 0.025mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0.49g | 9.35g | N/A |
| Iron | 0.13mg | 0.1mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 0.49g | 9.35g | N/A |
| Vitamin E | 0.23mg | 0.18mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.289mg | 0.009mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.739mg | 0.015mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.219mg | 0.025mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.093mg | 0.023mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 1.675mg | 0.047mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.619mg | 0.02mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.116mg | 0.031mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.439mg | 0.04mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.578mg | 0.018mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
42%
21%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
7%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Orange is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 90mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Orange contains less Sodium (difference - 800mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Orange is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 16.731g)
Which food is cheaper?
Orange is cheaper (difference - $2.6)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Limburger is lower in Sugar (difference - 8.86g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Limburger is lower in glycemic index (difference - 18)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Limburger is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Limburger is relatively richer in vitamins