Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up
  1. Home
  2. Foods
  3. Sweets
  4. Maple sugar
  5. Compare
  6. Maple sugar vs. Tomato paste

Maple sugar vs. Tomato paste — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

What are the main differences between maple sugar and tomato paste?

  • Maple sugar is richer in manganese and zinc, yet tomato paste is richer in vitamin A, copper, vitamin E, vitamin C, potassium, vitamin B3, iron, and fiber.
  • Maple sugar's daily need coverage for manganese is 179% higher.
  • Maple sugar has 10 times more zinc than tomato paste. Maple sugar has 6.06mg of zinc, while tomato paste has 0.63mg.
  • Tomato paste has a lower glycemic index than maple sugar.

We used Sugars, maple and Tomato products, canned, paste, without salt added types in this comparison.

Infographic

Maple sugar vs Tomato paste infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 14% 27% 24% 60% 33% 165% 1.3% 1.4% 577% 4.4%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 30% 11% 89% 112% 122% 17% 36% 7.7% 39% 29%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +150%
Contains more ZincZinc +861.9%
Contains less SodiumSodium -81.4%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +1364.2%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +121.1%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +270.1%
Contains more IronIron +85.1%
Contains more CopperCopper +268.7%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +2666.7%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +562.5%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 0% 0% 0% 0% 2.3% 3% 0.75% 2.9% 0.69% 0% 0% 0% 1.1%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 73% 25% 86% 0% 15% 35% 58% 8.5% 50% 0% 29% 9% 21%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +∞%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +∞%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +566.7%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +1076.9%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +7590%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +195.8%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +7100%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +∞%
Contains more FolateFolate +∞%
Contains more CholineCholine +1733.3%
~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg
~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Maple sugar Tomato paste DV% diff.
Manganese 4.422mg 0.302mg 179%
Zinc 6.06mg 0.63mg 49%
Copper 0.099mg 0.365mg 30%
Vitamin E 0mg 4.3mg 29%
Vitamin C 0mg 21.9mg 24%
Carbs 90.9g 18.91g 24%
Potassium 274mg 1014mg 22%
Vitamin B3 0.04mg 3.076mg 19%
Iron 1.61mg 2.98mg 17%
Vitamin B6 0.003mg 0.216mg 16%
Fiber 0g 4.1g 16%
Calories 354kcal 82kcal 14%
Vitamin B2 0.013mg 0.153mg 11%
Phosphorus 3mg 83mg 11%
Vitamin K 0µg 11.4µg 10%
Protein 0.1g 4.32g 8%
Selenium 0.8µg 5.3µg 8%
Vitamin A 0µg 76µg 8%
Choline 2.1mg 38.5mg 7%
Fructose 5.85g 7%
Magnesium 19mg 42mg 5%
Calcium 90mg 36mg 5%
Vitamin B1 0.009mg 0.06mg 4%
Folate 0µg 12µg 3%
Sodium 11mg 59mg 2%
Vitamin B5 0.048mg 0.142mg 2%
Fats 0.2g 0.47g 0%
Net carbs 90.9g 14.81g N/A
Sugar 84.87g 12.18g N/A
Starch 0.22g 0%
Saturated fat 0.036g 0.1g 0%
Monounsaturated fat 0.064g 0.067g 0%
Polyunsaturated fat 0.1g 0.16g 0%
Tryptophan 0.031mg 0%
Threonine 0.133mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.089mg 0%
Leucine 0.124mg 0%
Lysine 0.134mg 0%
Methionine 0.027mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.13mg 0%
Valine 0.088mg 0%
Histidine 0.071mg 0%

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
91% 8%
Protein: 0.1 g
Fats: 0.2 g
Carbs: 90.9 g
Water: 8 g
Other: 0.8 g
4% 19% 74% 3%
Protein: 4.32 g
Fats: 0.47 g
Carbs: 18.91 g
Water: 73.5 g
Other: 2.8 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +380.7%
Contains more ProteinProtein +4220%
Contains more FatsFats +135%
Contains more WaterWater +818.8%
Contains more OtherOther +250%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
18% 32% 50%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.036 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.064 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.1 g
31% 20% 49%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.1 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.067 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.16 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -64%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +60%
~equal in Monounsaturated fat ~0.067g

People also compare

Maple sugar
Maple sugar vs Corn syrup
Corn syrup
Maple sugar
Maple sugar vs Maple syrup
Maple syrup
Maple sugar
Maple sugar vs Snickers
Snickers
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato
Tomato
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato juice
Tomato juice
Tomato paste
Tomato paste vs Tomato sauce
Tomato sauce

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Maple sugar - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/169658/nutrients
  2. Tomato paste - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170459/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.