Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Macadamia vs. Pineapple juice — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Significant differences between macadamia and pineapple juice

  • Macadamia has more manganese, vitamin B1, copper, iron, fiber, magnesium, phosphorus, and vitamin B3; however, pineapple juice is richer in vitamin C.
  • Macadamia covers your daily manganese needs 158% more than pineapple juice.
  • Pineapple juice has 1508 times less saturated fat than macadamia. Macadamia has 12.061g of saturated fat, while pineapple juice has 0.008g.
  • Pineapple juice has a higher glycemic index. The glycemic index of pineapple juice is 47, while the glycemic index of macadamia is 10.

Specific food types used in this comparison are Nuts, macadamia nuts, raw and Pineapple juice, canned or bottled, unsweetened, with added ascorbic acid.

Infographic

Macadamia vs Pineapple juice infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 93% 26% 32% 138% 252% 35% 81% 0.65% 539% 20%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 8.6% 3.9% 11% 12% 23% 3% 3.4% 0.26% 66% 0.55%
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium +983.3%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +553.8%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +183.1%
Contains more IronIron +1090.3%
Contains more CopperCopper +995.7%
Contains more ZincZinc +1081.8%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +2250%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +719.6%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +3500%
Contains less SodiumSodium -60%

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 4% 0% 11% 0% 299% 37% 46% 45% 63% 0% 0% 8.3% 0%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 146% 0% 0.4% 0% 15% 4.8% 3.7% 3.4% 23% 0% 0.75% 14% 1.8%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +2600%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +1960.3%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +671.4%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +1142.7%
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 +1253.6%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +175%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +3550%
Contains more FolateFolate +63.6%
~equal in Vitamin A ~0µg
~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg
~equal in Vitamin B12 ~0µg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
8% 76% 14%
Protein: 7.91 g
Fats: 75.77 g
Carbs: 13.82 g
Water: 1.36 g
Other: 1.14 g
13% 86%
Protein: 0.36 g
Fats: 0.12 g
Carbs: 12.87 g
Water: 86.37 g
Other: 0.28 g
Contains more ProteinProtein +2097.2%
Contains more FatsFats +63041.7%
Contains more OtherOther +307.1%
Contains more WaterWater +6250.7%
~equal in Carbs ~12.87g

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
17% 81% 2%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 12.061 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 58.877 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 1.502 g
13% 22% 66%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.008 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.014 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 0.042 g
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +420450%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +3476.2%
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -99.9%

Carbohydrate type comparison

Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
19% 79%
Starch: 1.05 g
Sucrose: 4.43 g
Glucose: 0.07 g
Fructose: 0.07 g
Lactose: 0 g
Maltose: 0 g
Galactose: 0 g
15% 47% 38%
Starch: 0 g
Sucrose: 1.53 g
Glucose: 4.65 g
Fructose: 3.81 g
Lactose: 0 g
Maltose: 0 g
Galactose: 0 g
Contains more StarchStarch +∞%
Contains more SucroseSucrose +189.5%
Contains more GlucoseGlucose +6542.9%
Contains more FructoseFructose +5342.9%
~equal in Lactose ~0g
~equal in Maltose ~0g
~equal in Galactose ~0g

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Macadamia Pineapple juice
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price ok
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Cholesterol Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Macadamia Pineapple juice DV% diff.
Manganese 4.131mg 0.504mg 158%
Monounsaturated fat 58.877g 0.014g 147%
Fats 75.77g 0.12g 116%
Vitamin B1 1.195mg 0.058mg 95%
Copper 0.756mg 0.069mg 76%
Saturated fat 12.061g 0.008g 55%
Vitamin C 1.2mg 43.8mg 47%
Iron 3.69mg 0.31mg 42%
Fiber 8.6g 0.2g 34%
Calories 718kcal 53kcal 33%
Magnesium 130mg 12mg 28%
Phosphorus 188mg 8mg 26%
Protein 7.91g 0.36g 15%
Vitamin B3 2.473mg 0.199mg 14%
Vitamin B5 0.758mg 0.056mg 14%
Vitamin B6 0.275mg 0.1mg 13%
Zinc 1.3mg 0.11mg 11%
Vitamin B2 0.162mg 0.021mg 11%
Polyunsaturated fat 1.502g 0.042g 10%
Calcium 85mg 13mg 7%
Potassium 368mg 130mg 7%
Selenium 3.6µg 0.1µg 6%
Fructose 0.07g 3.81g 5%
Vitamin E 0.54mg 0.02mg 3%
Folate 11µg 18µg 2%
Choline 3.3mg 1%
Carbs 13.82g 12.87g 0%
Net carbs 5.22g 12.67g N/A
Sugar 4.57g 9.98g N/A
Starch 1.05g 0%
Sodium 5mg 2mg 0%
Vitamin K 0.3µg 0%
Tryptophan 0.067mg 0%
Threonine 0.37mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.314mg 0%
Leucine 0.602mg 0%
Lysine 0.018mg 0%
Methionine 0.023mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.665mg 0%
Valine 0.363mg 0%
Histidine 0.195mg 0%

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Macadamia Pineapple juice
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
40%
Macadamia
16%
Pineapple juice
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
122%
Macadamia
13%
Pineapple juice

Comparison summary

Which food contains less Sodium?
Pineapple juice
Pineapple juice contains less Sodium (difference - 3mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Pineapple juice
Pineapple juice is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 12.053g)
Which food is cheaper?
Pineapple juice
Pineapple juice is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Macadamia
Macadamia is lower in Sugar (difference - 5.41g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Macadamia
Macadamia is lower in glycemic index (difference - 37)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Macadamia
Macadamia is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Macadamia - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170178/nutrients
  2. Pineapple juice - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/168187/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.