Skipjack tuna vs. Chicken liver — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between skipjack tuna and chicken liver?
- Skipjack tuna is higher in vitamin B3, yet chicken liver is higher in vitamin B12, vitamin A, folate, vitamin B2, vitamin B5, iron, copper, and vitamin B1.
- Chicken liver's daily need coverage for vitamin B12 is 600% more.
- Skipjack tuna has 2 times more vitamin B3 than chicken liver. While skipjack tuna has 18.756mg of vitamin B3, chicken liver has only 9.728mg.
- The amount of cholesterol in skipjack tuna is lower.
We used Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat and Chicken, liver, all classes, raw types in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +131.6% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +362.5% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +127% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -33.8% |
| Contains more IronIron | +461.9% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +347.3% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +154.3% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1242.1% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +16.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +92.8% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +15% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +1690% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +18363.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +702.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +1357.4% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +1185.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +657.1% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +5780% |
~equal in
Vitamin D
~0µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
28.21 g
Fats:
1.29 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
62.28 g
Other:
8.22 g
Protein:
16.92 g
Fats:
4.83 g
Carbs:
0.73 g
Water:
76.46 g
Other:
1.06 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +66.7% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +675.5% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +274.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +22.8% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
0.42 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.243 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.403 g
Saturated Fat:
Sat. Fat
1.563 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
1.249 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
1.306 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated Fat | -73.1% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +414% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +224.1% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 132kcal | 119kcal |
|
| Protein | 28.21g | 16.92g |
|
| Fats | 1.29g | 4.83g |
|
| Vitamin C | 1mg | 17.9mg |
|
| Net carbs | 0g | 0.73g |
|
| Carbs | 0g | 0.73g |
|
| Cholesterol | 60mg | 345mg |
|
| Magnesium | 44mg | 19mg |
|
| Calcium | 37mg | 8mg |
|
| Potassium | 522mg | 230mg |
|
| Iron | 1.6mg | 8.99mg |
|
| Copper | 0.11mg | 0.492mg |
|
| Zinc | 1.05mg | 2.67mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 285mg | 297mg |
|
| Sodium | 47mg | 71mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 60IU | 11078IU |
|
| Vitamin A | 18µg | 3296µg |
|
| Vitamin E | 0.7mg |
|
|
| Manganese | 0.019mg | 0.255mg |
|
| Selenium | 46.8µg | 54.6µg |
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.038mg | 0.305mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.122mg | 1.778mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 18.756mg | 9.728mg |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.485mg | 6.233mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.981mg | 0.853mg |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 2.19µg | 16.58µg |
|
| Folate | 10µg | 588µg |
|
| Trans Fat | 0.065g |
|
|
| Choline | 194.4mg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.42g | 1.563g |
|
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.243g | 1.249g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.403g | 1.306g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.316mg | 0.176mg |
|
| Threonine | 1.237mg | 0.725mg |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.3mg | 0.813mg |
|
| Leucine | 2.293mg | 1.512mg |
|
| Lysine | 2.59mg | 1.332mg |
|
| Methionine | 0.835mg | 0.432mg |
|
| Phenylalanine | 1.101mg | 0.824mg |
|
| Valine | 1.453mg | 0.998mg |
|
| Histidine | 0.83mg | 0.507mg |
|
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.091g | 0g |
|
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.237g | 0g |
|
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.006g |
|
|
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.017g | 0g |
|
| Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid | 0.006g |
|
|
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.005g |
|
|
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.475g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
72%
354%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
108%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Skipjack tuna is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 285mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Skipjack tuna is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Skipjack tuna contains less Sodium (difference - 24mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Skipjack tuna is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 1.143g)
Which food is cheaper?
Chicken liver is cheaper (difference - $8)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Chicken liver is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Chicken liver is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes (0)