Sugar substitute vs. Arborio rice — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between sugar substitute and arborio rice
- Sugar substitute has more calcium; however, arborio rice has more iron, manganese, vitamin B1, copper, and vitamin B5.
- Sugar substitute's daily need coverage for calcium is 88% more.
- Arborio rice has a higher glycemic index than sugar substitute.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Rice, white, short-grain, enriched, cooked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +87800% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +50% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +33.3% |
| Contains more IronIron | +812.5% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +928.6% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +900% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +312.5% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -100% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1522.7% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +993.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +396.3% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +293.3% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Protein:
2.36 g
Fats:
0.19 g
Carbs:
28.73 g
Water:
68.53 g
Other:
0.19 g
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +195.1% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +2021.1% |
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +14.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +649.8% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Calcium | 879mg | 1mg | 88% |
| Sodium | 572mg | 0mg | 25% |
| Carbs | 84.77g | 28.73g | 19% |
| Iron | 0.16mg | 1.46mg | 16% |
| Folate | 59µg | 15% | |
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.357mg | 15% |
| Selenium | 7.5µg | 14% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.015mg | 0.164mg | 12% |
| Calories | 347kcal | 130kcal | 11% |
| Vitamin B3 | 1.493mg | 9% | |
| Copper | 0.007mg | 0.072mg | 7% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.08mg | 0.397mg | 6% |
| Phosphorus | 8mg | 33mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.059mg | 3% |
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 0.4mg | 3% |
| Fiber | 0.6g | 2% | |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Protein | 2.06g | 2.36g | 1% |
| Fats | 0g | 0.19g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 84.17g | 28.73g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 6mg | 8mg | 0% |
| Potassium | 39mg | 26mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 4.03g | N/A | |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.016mg | 0% |
| Saturated fat | 0.051g | 0% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.058g | 0% | |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.05g | 0% | |
| Tryptophan | 0.027mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.084mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.102mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.195mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.085mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.056mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.126mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.144mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.056mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
12%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
20%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.051g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Sugar substitute is lower in glycemic index (difference - 29)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $1)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Arborio rice is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.03g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Arborio rice contains less Sodium (difference - 572mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Arborio rice is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Arborio rice is relatively richer in vitamins