Sugar substitute vs. Rutabagas — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between Sugar substitute and Rutabagas
- Sugar substitute is richer in Calcium, yet Rutabagas are richer in Potassium, Fiber, Vitamin B6, Phosphorus, and Vitamin B1.
- Daily need coverage for Calcium from Sugar substitute is 84% higher.
- Sugar substitute contains 48 times more Sodium than Rutabagas. Sugar substitute contains 572mg of Sodium, while Rutabagas contain 12mg.
Food types used in this article are Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown and Rutabagas, raw.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains
more
Calcium
+1944.2%
Contains
more
Iron
+175%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+233.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+562.5%
Contains
more
Potassium
+682.1%
Contains
less
Sodium
-97.9%
Contains
more
Zinc
+500%
Contains
more
Copper
+357.1%
Contains
more
Manganese
+495.5%
Contains
more
Calcium
+1944.2%
Contains
more
Iron
+175%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+233.3%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+562.5%
Contains
more
Potassium
+682.1%
Contains
less
Sodium
-97.9%
Contains
more
Zinc
+500%
Contains
more
Copper
+357.1%
Contains
more
Manganese
+495.5%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
:
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+500%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+166.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+566.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+500%
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+166.7%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+100%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+566.7%
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Protein
+90.7%
Contains
more
Carbs
+883.4%
Contains
more
Other
+467.6%
Contains
more
Fats
+∞%
Contains
more
Water
+878.4%
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
Protein:
1.08 g
Fats:
0.16 g
Carbs:
8.62 g
Water:
89.43 g
Other:
0.71 g
Contains
more
Protein
+90.7%
Contains
more
Carbs
+883.4%
Contains
more
Other
+467.6%
Contains
more
Fats
+∞%
Contains
more
Water
+878.4%
Carbohydrate type comparison
Carbohydrate type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Contains
more
Starch
+780%
Contains
more
Maltose
+14600%
Contains
more
Sucrose
+∞%
Contains
more
Glucose
+111%
Contains
more
Fructose
+∞%
Starch:
3.52 g
Sucrose:
0 g
Glucose:
1.09 g
Fructose:
0 g
Lactose:
0 g
Maltose:
2.94 g
Galactose:
0 g
Starch:
0.4 g
Sucrose:
0.53 g
Glucose:
2.3 g
Fructose:
1.61 g
Lactose:
0 g
Maltose:
0.02 g
Galactose:
0 g
Contains
more
Starch
+780%
Contains
more
Maltose
+14600%
Contains
more
Sucrose
+∞%
Contains
more
Glucose
+111%
Contains
more
Fructose
+∞%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Net carbs | 84.17g | 6.32g |
|
| Protein | 2.06g | 1.08g |
|
| Fats | 0g | 0.16g |
|
| Carbs | 84.77g | 8.62g |
|
| Calories | 347kcal | 37kcal |
|
| Starch | 3.52g | 0.4g |
|
| Fructose | 0g | 1.61g |
|
| Sugar | 4.03g | 4.46g |
|
| Fiber | 0.6g | 2.3g |
|
| Calcium | 879mg | 43mg |
|
| Iron | 0.16mg | 0.44mg |
|
| Magnesium | 6mg | 20mg |
|
| Phosphorus | 8mg | 53mg |
|
| Potassium | 39mg | 305mg |
|
| Sodium | 572mg | 12mg |
|
| Zinc | 0.04mg | 0.24mg |
|
| Copper | 0.007mg | 0.032mg |
|
| Manganese | 0.022mg | 0.131mg |
|
| Selenium | 0.7µg |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 2IU |
|
|
| Vitamin E | 0.3mg |
|
|
| Vitamin C | 25mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.015mg | 0.09mg |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.015mg | 0.04mg |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.7mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.08mg | 0.16mg |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.015mg | 0.1mg |
|
| Folate | 21µg |
|
|
| Vitamin K | 0.3µg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 0.027g |
|
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.025g |
|
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.088g |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
1%
15%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
36%
13%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Sugar substitute is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.43g)
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 0mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.027g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Sugar substitute is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $2.5)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Rutabagas contains less Sodium (difference - 560mg)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Rutabagas is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Rutabagas is relatively richer in vitamins