Wafer vs. Castanea crenata — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are wafer and castanea crenata different?
- Wafer is higher in iron, phosphorus, and vitamin B3; however, castanea crenata is richer in manganese, vitamin C, vitamin B6, vitamin B1, and copper.
- Daily need coverage for manganese for castanea crenata is 39% higher.
- Wafer contains 54 times more saturated fat than castanea crenata. While wafer contains 4.241g of saturated fat, castanea crenata contains only 0.078g.
Cookies, chocolate wafers and Nuts, chestnuts, japanese, raw are the varieties used in this article.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more IronIron | +176.6% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +83.3% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +56.7% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +21.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -97.6% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +128.6% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +50% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +63.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +90.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +85% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K | +∞% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +69.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +454.9% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
6.6 g
Fats:
14.2 g
Carbs:
72.7 g
Water:
4.5 g
Other:
2 g
Protein:
2.25 g
Fats:
0.53 g
Carbs:
34.91 g
Water:
61.41 g
Other:
0.9 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +193.3% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +2579.2% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +108.2% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +122.2% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +1264.7% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
4.241 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
4.865 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
4.153 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.078 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.278 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.138 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +1650% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +2909.4% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -98.2% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Manganese | 0.696mg | 1.591mg | 39% |
| Iron | 4.01mg | 1.45mg | 32% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 26.3mg | 29% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.153g | 0.138g | 27% |
| Sodium | 580mg | 14mg | 25% |
| Fats | 14.2g | 0.53g | 21% |
| Saturated fat | 4.241g | 0.078g | 19% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.051mg | 0.283mg | 18% |
| Calories | 433kcal | 154kcal | 14% |
| Fiber | 3.4g | 14% | |
| Carbs | 72.7g | 34.91g | 13% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.203mg | 0.344mg | 12% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 4.865g | 0.278g | 11% |
| Copper | 0.463mg | 0.562mg | 11% |
| Selenium | 5.7µg | 10% | |
| Phosphorus | 132mg | 72mg | 9% |
| Protein | 6.6g | 2.25g | 9% |
| Vitamin B3 | 2.858mg | 1.5mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.266mg | 0.163mg | 8% |
| Vitamin E | 0.72mg | 5% | |
| Potassium | 210mg | 329mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.381mg | 0.206mg | 4% |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.09µg | 0µg | 4% |
| Choline | 14.3mg | 3% | |
| Caffeine | 10mg | 3% | |
| Vitamin K | 2.4µg | 2% | |
| Cholesterol | 2mg | 0mg | 1% |
| Magnesium | 53mg | 49mg | 1% |
| Net carbs | 69.3g | 34.91g | N/A |
| Calcium | 31mg | 31mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 37.43g | N/A | |
| Zinc | 1.09mg | 1.1mg | 0% |
| Vitamin A | 3µg | 2µg | 0% |
| Folate | 47µg | 47µg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.096mg | 0.032mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 0.22mg | 0.09mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 0.261mg | 0.111mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 0.447mg | 0.139mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 0.281mg | 0.147mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.105mg | 0.054mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 0.308mg | 0.088mg | 0% |
| Valine | 0.323mg | 0.134mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.128mg | 0.056mg | 0% |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.003g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.002g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
21%
27%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
65%
59%
Comparison summary
Which food is cheaper?
Wafer is cheaper (difference - $2.6)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Wafer is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Castanea crenata is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 2mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Castanea crenata is lower in Sugar (difference - 37.43g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Castanea crenata contains less Sodium (difference - 566mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Castanea crenata is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 4.163g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Castanea crenata is lower in glycemic index (difference - 61)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.