Beef consomme vs. Tomato bisque — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
A recap on differences between Beef consomme and Tomato bisque
- Tomato bisque is higher than Beef consomme in Potassium, Iron, and Polyunsaturated fat.
Food varieties used in this article are CAMPBELL'S Red and White, Beef Consomme, condensed and Soup, tomato bisque, canned, condensed.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +915.6% |
| Contains more IronIron | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
~equal in
Vitamin D
~µg
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
3.23 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
0.81 g
Water:
93.5 g
Other:
2.46 g
Protein:
1.76 g
Fats:
1.95 g
Carbs:
18.47 g
Water:
75.32 g
Other:
2.5 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +83.5% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +24.1% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +2180.2% |
~equal in
Other
~2.5g
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index | Equal | ||
| Lower in price | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 16kcal | 96kcal |
|
| Protein | 3.23g | 1.76g |
|
| Fats | 0g | 1.95g |
|
| Vitamin C | 4.6mg |
|
|
| Net carbs | 0.81g | 17.67g |
|
| Carbs | 0.81g | 18.47g |
|
| Cholesterol | 0mg | 4mg |
|
| Magnesium | 7mg |
|
|
| Calcium | 0mg | 31mg |
|
| Potassium | 32mg | 325mg |
|
| Iron | 0mg | 0.64mg |
|
| Sugar | 0.81g |
|
|
| Fiber | 0g | 0.8g |
|
| Copper | 0.1mg |
|
|
| Zinc | 0.46mg |
|
|
| Phosphorus | 47mg |
|
|
| Sodium | 653mg | 698mg |
|
| Vitamin A | 562IU |
|
|
| Vitamin A | 32µg |
|
|
| Manganese | 0.2mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B1 | 0.051mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.055mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B3 | 0.894mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.1mg |
|
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.07mg |
|
|
| Folate | 12µg |
|
|
| Saturated Fat | 0g | 0.42g |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0g | 0.53g |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0g | 0.87g |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.018mg |
|
|
| Threonine | 0.052mg |
|
|
| Isoleucine | 0.06mg |
|
|
| Leucine | 0.098mg |
|
|
| Lysine | 0.07mg |
|
|
| Methionine | 0.023mg |
|
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.06mg |
|
|
| Valine | 0.068mg |
|
|
| Histidine | 0.034mg |
|
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet | Equal | |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
0%
9%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
9%
25%
Comparison summary
Which food is richer in minerals?
Tomato bisque is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Tomato bisque is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.81g)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Tomato bisque is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Beef consomme is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 4mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Beef consomme contains less Sodium (difference - 45mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Beef consomme is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 0.42g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
?
The foods have equal glycemic indexes ()
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)