Beef shank vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Important differences between beef shank and kielbasa
- Beef shank has more iron; however, kielbasa has more vitamin C, polyunsaturated fat, and monounsaturated fat.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 49% more.
- Beef shank has 3 times more iron than kielbasa. Beef shank has 3.86mg of iron, while kielbasa has 1.24mg.
- Beef shank is lower in saturated fat.
- Kielbasa has a higher glycemic index than beef shank.
The food varieties used in the comparison are Beef, shank crosscuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, simmered and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey and beef, smoked.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +∞% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
| Contains more IronIron | +211.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +∞% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +∞% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +∞% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -94.7% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
33.68 g
Fats:
6.36 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
58.21 g
Other:
1.75 g
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +157.1% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +176.7% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +94.3% |
~equal in
Water
~62g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
2.29 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.86 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.21 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -63.2% |
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +189.2% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1009.5% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 3.79µg | 158% | |
| Zinc | 10.49mg | 95% | |
| Selenium | 30µg | 55% | |
| Sodium | 64mg | 1200mg | 49% |
| Protein | 33.68g | 13.1g | 41% |
| Phosphorus | 263mg | 38% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 5.89mg | 37% | |
| Iron | 3.86mg | 1.24mg | 33% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.37mg | 28% | |
| Copper | 0.172mg | 19% | |
| Saturated fat | 2.29g | 6.23g | 18% |
| Fats | 6.36g | 17.6g | 17% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 14.8mg | 16% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.21mg | 16% | |
| Monounsaturated fat | 2.86g | 8.27g | 14% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.21g | 2.33g | 14% |
| Potassium | 447mg | 13% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.14mg | 12% | |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.41mg | 8% | |
| Magnesium | 30mg | 7% | |
| Folate | 10µg | 3% | |
| Calcium | 32mg | 3% | |
| Cholesterol | 78mg | 70mg | 3% |
| Calories | 201kcal | 226kcal | 1% |
| Manganese | 0.02mg | 1% | |
| Carbs | 0g | 3.9g | 1% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 3.9g | N/A |
| Tryptophan | 0.377mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.471mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.514mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 2.662mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.802mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.862mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 1.315mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.638mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 1.153mg | 0% |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
60%
4%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
85%
20%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Kielbasa is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 8mg)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Beef shank is lower in Sugar (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Beef shank contains less Sodium (difference - 1136mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Beef shank is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.94g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Beef shank is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Beef shank is cheaper (difference - $1.5)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Beef shank is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Beef shank is relatively richer in vitamins