Beef tenderloin vs Italian sausage - In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Infographic
Copy infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Iron
+163.6%
Contains
more
Potassium
+30.8%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+57.1%
Contains
more
Copper
+53.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+125.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+43%
Contains
less
Sodium
-92.2%
Contains
more
Calcium
+100%
Contains
more
Iron
+163.6%
Contains
more
Potassium
+30.8%
Contains
more
Magnesium
+57.1%
Contains
more
Copper
+53.8%
Contains
more
Zinc
+125.1%
Contains
more
Phosphorus
+43%
Contains
less
Sodium
-92.2%
Contains
more
Calcium
+100%
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" chart below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
:
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+54.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+170.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+531.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+104%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+20%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 3.25
Equal in Folate, total - 8
Contains
more
Vitamin B2
+54.8%
Contains
more
Vitamin B12
+170.3%
Contains
more
Vitamin C
+∞%
Contains
more
Vitamin B1
+531.1%
Contains
more
Vitamin B5
+104%
Contains
more
Vitamin B6
+20%
Equal in Vitamin B3 - 3.25
Equal in Folate, total - 8
Vitamin and Mineral Summary Scores
Summary score is calculated by summing up the daily values contained in 300 grams of the product. Obviously the more the food fulfils human daily needs, the more the summary score is
Vitamin Summary Score
22
24
Mineral Summary Score
33
30
Macronutrients Comparison
Macronutrient comparison charts compare the amount of protein, total fats and total carbohydrates in 300 grams of the food. The displayed values show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food
Protein
143%
86%
Carbohydrates
0%
1%
Fats
114%
145%
Comparison summary table
Pay attention at the most right column. It shows the amounts side by side, making it easier to realize the amount of difference.
|
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Sugars |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated Fat |
|
||
| Lower in glycemic index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins | Equal | ||
Which food is preferable in case of diets?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low glycemic index diet |
|
People also compare
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Italian sausage is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 9mg)
Which food contains less Sugars?
Italian sausage contains less Sugars (difference - 0g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Beef tenderloin contains less Sodium (difference - 674mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated Fat?
Beef tenderloin is lower in Saturated Fat (difference - 1.55g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Beef tenderloin is lower in glycemic index (difference - 28)
Which food is cheaper?
Beef tenderloin is cheaper (difference - $2.2)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Beef tenderloin is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be definitely stated which food is richer in vitamins. See charts below for detailed information.
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
In the column "Opinion" we made some assumptions which could be controversial. For instance we are assuming that less saturated fats is good for you. Please ignore this column if you have your own opinion.We marked the nutrients, comparison of which we considered as not meaningful, as "N/A"
| Nutrient | |
|
Opinion |
| Calories | 324 | 346 |
|
| Protein | 23.9 | 14.25 |
|
| Fats | 24.6 | 31.33 |
|
| Vitamin C | 0 | 2 |
|
| Carbs | 0 | 0.65 |
|
| Cholesterol | 85 | 76 |
|
| Vitamin D | |||
| Iron | 3.11 | 1.18 |
|
| Calcium | 9 | 18 |
|
| Potassium | 331 | 253 |
|
| Magnesium | 22 | 14 |
|
| Sugars | 0 |
|
|
| Fiber | 0 | 0 | |
| Copper | 0.123 | 0.08 |
|
| Zinc | 4.03 | 1.79 |
|
| Starch | |||
| Phosphorus | 203 | 142 |
|
| Sodium | 57 | 731 |
|
| Vitamin A | 0 | 0 | |
| Vitamin E | |||
| Vitamin D | |||
| Vitamin B1 | 0.09 | 0.568 |
|
| Vitamin B2 | 0.26 | 0.168 |
|
| Vitamin B3 | 3 | 3.25 |
|
| Vitamin B5 | 0.25 | 0.51 |
|
| Vitamin B6 | 0.25 | 0.3 |
|
| Vitamin B12 | 2.46 | 0.91 |
|
| Vitamin K | |||
| Folate, total | 8 | 8 | |
| Folic acid (B9) | 0 | 0 | |
| Trans Fat | |||
| Saturated Fat | 9.72 | 11.27 |
|
| Monounsaturated Fat | 10.27 | 14.34 |
|
| Polyunsaturated fat | 1 | 4.03 |
|
| Tryptophan | 0.268 | 0.114 |
|
| Threonine | 1.044 | 0.563 |
|
| Isoleucine | 1.075 | 0.52 |
|
| Leucine | 1.889 | 0.956 |
|
| Lysine | 1.989 | 1.083 |
|
| Methionine | 0.612 | 0.346 |
|
| Phenylalanine | 0.933 | 0.477 |
|
| Valine | 1.163 | 0.572 |
|
| Histidine | 0.818 | 0.411 |
|
| Fructose |