Cherimoya vs. Salsa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
Significant differences between cherimoya and salsa
- Cherimoya has more vitamin C, vitamin B6, vitamin B2, and fiber; however, salsa is richer in iron and vitamin A.
- Salsa covers your daily iron needs 25% more than cherimoya.
- Salsa has 4 times less vitamin B2 than cherimoya. Cherimoya has 0.131mg of vitamin B2, while salsa has 0.03mg.
- Cherimoya contains less sodium.
Specific food types used in this comparison are Cherimoya, raw and USDA Commodity, salsa.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -98.4% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +20% |
| Contains more IronIron | +729.6% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +39.1% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +15.4% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +215% |
| Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +102% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +336.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +72.5% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +21.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +67.7% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more FatsFats | +240% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +153% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +13% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +146.2% |
~equal in
Protein
~1.5g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +243.8% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +75.7% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -87.6% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Lower in Cholesterol | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Iron | 0.27mg | 2.24mg | 25% |
| Sodium | 7mg | 430mg | 18% |
| Vitamin C | 12.6mg | 4mg | 10% |
| Fructose | 6.28g | 8% | |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.257mg | 0.149mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.131mg | 0.03mg | 8% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.345mg | 7% | |
| Fiber | 3g | 1.4g | 6% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.101mg | 0.05mg | 4% |
| Carbs | 17.71g | 7g | 4% |
| Manganese | 0.093mg | 4% | |
| Vitamin B3 | 0.644mg | 1.08mg | 3% |
| Copper | 0.069mg | 0.096mg | 3% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 28µg | 3% |
| Vitamin E | 0.27mg | 2% | |
| Calories | 75kcal | 36kcal | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 26mg | 30mg | 1% |
| Folate | 23µg | 19µg | 1% |
| Fats | 0.68g | 0.2g | 1% |
| Saturated fat | 0.233g | 0.029g | 1% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.188g | 0.107g | 1% |
| Potassium | 287mg | 270mg | 1% |
| Selenium | 0.4µg | 1% | |
| Protein | 1.57g | 1.5g | 0% |
| Net carbs | 14.71g | 5.6g | N/A |
| Magnesium | 17mg | 16mg | 0% |
| Calcium | 10mg | 12mg | 0% |
| Sugar | 12.87g | N/A | |
| Zinc | 0.16mg | 0.17mg | 0% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 0.055g | 0.016g | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.031mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 0.052mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 0.042mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 0.063mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 0.042mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.021mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.042mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 0.063mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.021mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.159g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.028g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
16%
9%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
10%
23%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Salsa is lower in Sugar (difference - 12.87g)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Salsa is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 0.204g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Salsa is lower in glycemic index (difference - 59)
Which food is cheaper?
Salsa is cheaper (difference - $3)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Salsa is relatively richer in minerals
Which food contains less Sodium?
Cherimoya contains less Sodium (difference - 423mg)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Cherimoya is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food contains less Cholesterol?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Cholesterol (0 mg)