Chewing gum vs. Kielbasa — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the differences between chewing gum and kielbasa?
- Chewing gum is higher in fiber, yet kielbasa is higher in vitamin C, iron, monounsaturated fat, and polyunsaturated fat.
- Kielbasa's daily need coverage for sodium is 52% more.
- The amount of sugar in kielbasa is lower.
We used Chewing gum and Kielbasa, Polish, turkey, and beef, smoked types in this article.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +∞% |
Contains less SodiumSodium | -99.9% |
Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
Contains more IronIron | +∞% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
Sodium | 1mg | 1200mg | 52% |
Carbs | 96.7g | 3.9g | 31% |
Saturated fat | 0.042g | 6.23g | 28% |
Fats | 0.3g | 17.6g | 27% |
Protein | 0g | 13.1g | 26% |
Cholesterol | 0mg | 70mg | 23% |
Monounsaturated fat | 0.079g | 8.27g | 20% |
Vitamin C | 0mg | 14.8mg | 16% |
Iron | 0mg | 1.24mg | 16% |
Polyunsaturated fat | 0.137g | 2.33g | 15% |
Fiber | 2.4g | 0g | 10% |
Calories | 360kcal | 226kcal | 7% |
Selenium | 0.6µg | 1% | |
Net carbs | 94.3g | 3.9g | N/A |
Potassium | 2mg | 0% | |
Sugar | 66.08g | 0g | N/A |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
0 g
Fats:
0.3 g
Carbs:
96.7 g
Water:
2.6 g
Other:
0.4 g
Protein:
13.1 g
Fats:
17.6 g
Carbs:
3.9 g
Water:
62 g
Other:
3.4 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs | +2379.5% |
Contains more ProteinProtein | +∞% |
Contains more FatsFats | +5766.7% |
Contains more WaterWater | +2284.6% |
Contains more OtherOther | +750% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.042 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
0.079 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.137 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
6.23 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
8.27 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.33 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -99.3% |
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +10368.4% |
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +1600.7% |