Foodstruct Nutrition Search | Diet Analysis | Food Comparison | Glycemic Index Chart | Insulin Index Chart | Blog | Subscribe | Sign Up

Chinese fried rice vs. Pork skins — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison

Compare

Summary of differences between Chinese fried rice and pork skins

  • Chinese fried rice has more manganese, while pork skins have more selenium, choline, vitamin B1,2, vitamin B2, vitamin B1, and vitamin B3.
  • Pork skins cover your daily need for sodium, 62% more than Chinese fried rice.
  • Chinese fried rice contains 6 times more manganese than pork skins. While Chinese fried rice contains 0.433mg of manganese, pork skins contain only 0.069mg.
  • The amount of sodium in Chinese fried rice is lower.
  • Pork skins have a lower glycemic index. The glycemic index of pork skins is 0, while the glycemic index of Chinese fried rice is 80.

These are the specific foods used in this comparison Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat and Snacks, pork skins, plain.

Infographic

Chinese fried rice vs Pork skins infographic
Infographic link

Mineral Comparison

Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 7.1% 3.6% 6.7% 25% 32% 20% 22% 50% 56% 45%
Magnesium Magnesium Calcium Calcium Potassium Potassium Iron Iron Copper Copper Zinc Zinc Phosphorus Phosphorus Sodium Sodium Manganese Manganese Selenium Selenium 7.9% 9% 11% 33% 31% 15% 36% 237% 9% 224%
Contains more ZincZinc +28.6%
Contains less SodiumSodium -78.7%
Contains more ManganeseManganese +527.5%
Contains more CalciumCalcium +150%
Contains more PotassiumPotassium +67.1%
Contains more IronIron +33.3%
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus +66.7%
Contains more SeleniumSelenium +394%
~equal in Magnesium ~11mg
~equal in Copper ~0.094mg

Vitamin Comparison

Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 13% 7.3% 2.6% 0% 3.8% 6% 12% 0% 7.4% 0% 7% 4.5% 3%
Vitamin C Vit. C Vitamin A Vit. A Vitamin E Vit. E Vitamin D Vit. D Vitamin B1 Vit. B1 Vitamin B2 Vit. B2 Vitamin B3 Vit. B3 Vitamin B5 Vit. B5 Vitamin B6 Vit. B6 Vitamin B12 Vit. B12 Vitamin K Vit. K Folate Folate Choline Choline 1.7% 4% 11% 0% 25% 65% 29% 26% 5.3% 80% 0% 0% 90%
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C +660%
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A +83.3%
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 +39.1%
Contains more Vitamin KVitamin K +∞%
Contains more FolateFolate +∞%
Contains more Vitamin EVitamin E +307.7%
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 +560%
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 +988.5%
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 +143.2%
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 +∞%
Contains more CholineCholine +2890.9%
~equal in Vitamin D ~0µg

Macronutrient Comparison

Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
4% 3% 33% 59%
Protein: 4.05 g
Fats: 2.96 g
Carbs: 32.79 g
Water: 59.09 g
Other: 1.11 g
61% 31% 2% 6%
Protein: 61.3 g
Fats: 31.3 g
Carbs: 0 g
Water: 1.8 g
Other: 5.6 g
Contains more CarbsCarbs +∞%
Contains more WaterWater +3182.8%
Contains more ProteinProtein +1413.6%
Contains more FatsFats +957.4%
Contains more OtherOther +404.5%

Fat Type Comparison

Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
23% 28% 48%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 0.54 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 0.649 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 1.111 g
38% 50% 12%
Saturated fat: Sat. Fat 11.37 g
Monounsaturated fat: Mono. Fat 14.78 g
Polyunsaturated fat: Poly. Fat 3.64 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat -95.3%
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat +2177.3%
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat +227.6%

Comparison summary table

Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
Chinese fried rice Pork skins
Lower in Sugar ok
Lower in Glycemic Index ok
Rich in minerals ok
Lower in Cholesterol ok
Lower in Sodium ok
Lower in Saturated fat ok
Lower in price Equal
Rich in vitamins Equal

All nutrients comparison - raw data values

Nutrient Chinese fried rice Pork skins DV% diff.
Protein 4.05g 61.3g 115%
Sodium 387mg 1818mg 62%
Selenium 8.3µg 41µg 59%
Saturated fat 0.54g 11.37g 49%
Fats 2.96g 31.3g 44%
Monounsaturated fat 0.649g 14.78g 35%
Choline 5.5mg 164.5mg 29%
Vitamin B12 0µg 0.64µg 27%
Cholesterol 18mg 95mg 26%
Vitamin B2 0.026mg 0.283mg 20%
Calories 174kcal 544kcal 19%
Polyunsaturated fat 1.111g 3.64g 17%
Manganese 0.433mg 0.069mg 16%
Starch 30.8g 13%
Carbs 32.79g 0g 11%
Vitamin B5 0.43mg 9%
Vitamin B1 0.015mg 0.099mg 7%
Vitamin B3 0.637mg 1.549mg 6%
Phosphorus 51mg 85mg 5%
Vitamin C 3.8mg 0.5mg 4%
Fiber 1.1g 0g 4%
Vitamin E 0.13mg 0.53mg 3%
Iron 0.66mg 0.88mg 3%
Calcium 12mg 30mg 2%
Potassium 76mg 127mg 2%
Vitamin K 2.8µg 0µg 2%
Folate 6µg 0µg 2%
Vitamin A 22µg 12µg 1%
Zinc 0.72mg 0.56mg 1%
Vitamin B6 0.032mg 0.023mg 1%
Net carbs 31.69g 0g N/A
Magnesium 10mg 11mg 0%
Sugar 0.56g 0g N/A
Copper 0.095mg 0.094mg 0%
Trans fat 0.011g N/A
Tryptophan 0.052mg 0.118mg 0%
Threonine 0.173mg 1.823mg 0%
Isoleucine 0.173mg 1.382mg 0%
Leucine 0.335mg 3.322mg 0%
Lysine 0.173mg 2.783mg 0%
Methionine 0.114mg 0.48mg 0%
Phenylalanine 0.225mg 1.94mg 0%
Valine 0.251mg 2.421mg 0%
Histidine 0.094mg 0.725mg 0%
Fructose 0.05g 0%
Omega-3 - DHA 0.002g 0g N/A
Omega-3 - ALA 0.111g N/A
Omega-6 - Gamma-linoleic acid 0.002g N/A
Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid 0.001g N/A
Omega-6 - Linoleic acid 0.981g N/A

Which food is preferable for your diet?

ok
ok
is better in case of low diet
Chinese fried rice Pork skins
Low Calories diet ok
Low Fats diet ok
Low Carbs diet ok
Low Glycemic Index diet ok

People also compare

Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score

The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
5%
Chinese fried rice
26%
Pork skins
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
27%
Chinese fried rice
61%
Pork skins

Comparison summary

Which food is lower in Sugar?
Pork skins
Pork skins is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.56g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Pork skins
Pork skins is lower in glycemic index (difference - 80)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Pork skins
Pork skins is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Chinese fried rice
Chinese fried rice is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 77mg)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Chinese fried rice
Chinese fried rice contains less Sodium (difference - 1431mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Chinese fried rice
Chinese fried rice is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 10.83g)
Which food is cheaper?
?
The foods are relatively equal in price ($)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.

References

All the values for which the sources are not specified explicitly are taken from FDA’s Food Central. The exact link to the food presented on this page can be found below.

  1. Chinese fried rice - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167668/nutrients
  2. Pork skins - https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167961/nutrients

All the Daily Values are presented for males aged 31-50, for 2000-calorie diets.

Data provided by FoodStruct.com should be considered and used as information only. Please consult your physician before beginning any diet.