Mackerel vs. Chocolate cake — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
How are mackerel and chocolate cake different?
- Mackerel is richer in vitamin B12, selenium, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin B2, and vitamin B5, while chocolate cake is higher in copper and manganese.
- Mackerel covers your daily need for vitamin B12, 785% more than chocolate cake.
- Mackerel contains 11 times more vitamin B6 than chocolate cake. Mackerel contains 0.46mg of vitamin B6, while chocolate cake contains 0.041mg.
- Chocolate cake has a higher glycemic index (41) than mackerel (0).
Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat and Cake, chocolate, prepared from recipe without frosting types were used in this article.
Infographic

Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +203.1% |
Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +186.4% |
Contains more ZincZinc | +36.2% |
Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +162.3% |
Contains less SodiumSodium | -73.7% |
Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +333.6% |
Contains more CalciumCalcium | +300% |
Contains more CopperCopper | +120.2% |
Contains more ManganeseManganese | +1300% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +100% |
Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +12.8% |
Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +93.4% |
Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +502.5% |
Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +225.7% |
Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +1022% |
Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +11775% |
Contains more FolateFolate | +1250% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
23.85 g
Fats:
17.81 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
53.27 g
Other:
5.07 g
Protein:
5.3 g
Fats:
15.1 g
Carbs:
53.4 g
Water:
24.4 g
Other:
1.8 g
Contains more ProteinProtein | +350% |
Contains more FatsFats | +17.9% |
Contains more WaterWater | +118.3% |
Contains more OtherOther | +181.7% |
Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
4.176 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
7.006 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
4.3 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
5.43 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
6.039 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
2.761 g
Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -23.1% |
Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +16% |
Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +55.7% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
![]() |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sodium |
![]() |
||
Lower in Saturated fat |
![]() |
||
Lower in Glycemic Index |
![]() |
||
Rich in vitamins |
![]() |
||
Lower in Cholesterol |
![]() |
||
Lower in price |
![]() |
||
Lower in Sugar | Equal | ||
Rich in minerals | Equal |
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
Nutrient | ![]() |
![]() |
DV% diff. |
Vitamin B12 | 19µg | 0.16µg | 785% |
Selenium | 51.6µg | 11.9µg | 72% |
Protein | 23.85g | 5.3g | 37% |
Vitamin B3 | 6.85mg | 1.137mg | 36% |
Vitamin B6 | 0.46mg | 0.041mg | 32% |
Phosphorus | 278mg | 106mg | 25% |
Choline | 128.4mg | 23% | |
Carbs | 0g | 53.4g | 18% |
Vitamin B2 | 0.412mg | 0.213mg | 15% |
Magnesium | 97mg | 32mg | 15% |
Vitamin B5 | 0.99mg | 0.304mg | 14% |
Copper | 0.094mg | 0.207mg | 13% |
Manganese | 0.02mg | 0.28mg | 11% |
Sodium | 83mg | 315mg | 10% |
Polyunsaturated fat | 4.3g | 2.761g | 10% |
Potassium | 401mg | 140mg | 8% |
Saturated fat | 4.176g | 5.43g | 6% |
Fiber | 0g | 1.6g | 6% |
Folate | 2µg | 27µg | 6% |
Cholesterol | 75mg | 58mg | 6% |
Vitamin A | 54µg | 6% | |
Calories | 262kcal | 371kcal | 5% |
Calcium | 15mg | 60mg | 5% |
Fats | 17.81g | 15.1g | 4% |
Vitamin B1 | 0.159mg | 0.141mg | 2% |
Zinc | 0.94mg | 0.69mg | 2% |
Monounsaturated fat | 7.006g | 6.039g | 2% |
Iron | 1.57mg | 1.61mg | 1% |
Vitamin C | 0.4mg | 0.2mg | 0% |
Net carbs | 0g | 51.8g | N/A |
Tryptophan | 0.267mg | 0.068mg | 0% |
Threonine | 1.045mg | 0.202mg | 0% |
Isoleucine | 1.099mg | 0.24mg | 0% |
Leucine | 1.938mg | 0.407mg | 0% |
Lysine | 2.19mg | 0.268mg | 0% |
Methionine | 0.706mg | 0.116mg | 0% |
Phenylalanine | 0.931mg | 0.265mg | 0% |
Valine | 1.228mg | 0.283mg | 0% |
Histidine | 0.702mg | 0.12mg | 0% |
Omega-3 - EPA | 0.504g | 0g | N/A |
Omega-3 - DHA | 0.699g | 0.005g | N/A |
Omega-3 - DPA | 0.106g | 0g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?


is better in case of low diet
![]() |
![]() |
|
Low Calories diet |
![]() |
|
Low Fats diet |
![]() |
|
Low Carbs diet |
![]() |
|
Low Glycemic Index diet |
![]() |
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
217%

19%

Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
64%

39%

Comparison summary
Which food contains less Sodium?

Mackerel contains less Sodium (difference - 232mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?

Mackerel is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 1.254g)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?

Mackerel is lower in glycemic index (difference - 41)
Which food is richer in vitamins?

Mackerel is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?

Chocolate cake is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 17mg)
Which food is cheaper?

Chocolate cake is cheaper (difference - $7)
Which food contains less Sugar?
?
The foods are relatively equal in Sugar ( g)
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.