Mackerel vs. Sugar substitute — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
What are the main differences between mackerel and sugar substitute?
- Mackerel is richer in phosphorus, vitamin B6, vitamin B2, magnesium, vitamin B5, iron, vitamin B1, and potassium, while sugar substitute is higher in calcium.
- Sugar substitute's daily need coverage for calcium is 86% higher.
- Sugar substitute has 35 times less phosphorus than mackerel. Mackerel has 278mg of phosphorus, while sugar substitute has 8mg.
- Mackerel is lower in sodium.
- Sugar substitute has a higher glycemic index (40) than mackerel (0).
We used Fish, mackerel, Atlantic, cooked, dry heat and Sweeteners, sugar substitute, granulated, brown types in this comparison.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +1516.7% |
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +928.2% |
| Contains more IronIron | +881.3% |
| Contains more CopperCopper | +1242.9% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +2250% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +3375% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -85.5% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +∞% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +5760% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +960% |
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +2646.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +1137.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +2966.7% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +∞% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
23.85 g
Fats:
17.81 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
53.27 g
Other:
5.07 g
Protein:
2.06 g
Fats:
0 g
Carbs:
84.77 g
Water:
9.14 g
Other:
4.03 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +1057.8% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +482.8% |
| Contains more OtherOther | +25.8% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Rich in minerals |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 19µg | 792% | |
| Selenium | 51.6µg | 94% | |
| Calcium | 15mg | 879mg | 86% |
| Protein | 23.85g | 2.06g | 44% |
| Vitamin B3 | 6.85mg | 43% | |
| Phosphorus | 278mg | 8mg | 39% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.46mg | 0.015mg | 34% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.412mg | 0.015mg | 31% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 4.3g | 29% | |
| Carbs | 0g | 84.77g | 28% |
| Fats | 17.81g | 0g | 27% |
| Cholesterol | 75mg | 25% | |
| Magnesium | 97mg | 6mg | 22% |
| Sodium | 83mg | 572mg | 21% |
| Saturated fat | 4.176g | 19% | |
| Iron | 1.57mg | 0.16mg | 18% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.99mg | 0.08mg | 18% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 7.006g | 18% | |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.159mg | 0.015mg | 12% |
| Potassium | 401mg | 39mg | 11% |
| Copper | 0.094mg | 0.007mg | 10% |
| Zinc | 0.94mg | 0.04mg | 8% |
| Vitamin A | 54µg | 6% | |
| Calories | 262kcal | 347kcal | 4% |
| Fiber | 0g | 0.6g | 2% |
| Starch | 3.52g | 1% | |
| Folate | 2µg | 1% | |
| Vitamin C | 0.4mg | 0% | |
| Net carbs | 0g | 84.17g | N/A |
| Sugar | 4.03g | N/A | |
| Manganese | 0.02mg | 0.022mg | 0% |
| Tryptophan | 0.267mg | 0% | |
| Threonine | 1.045mg | 0% | |
| Isoleucine | 1.099mg | 0% | |
| Leucine | 1.938mg | 0% | |
| Lysine | 2.19mg | 0% | |
| Methionine | 0.706mg | 0% | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.931mg | 0% | |
| Valine | 1.228mg | 0% | |
| Histidine | 0.702mg | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - EPA | 0.504g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DHA | 0.699g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - DPA | 0.106g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
217%
1%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
64%
36%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Sugar substitute is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 75mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Sugar substitute is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 4.176g)
Which food is cheaper?
Sugar substitute is cheaper (difference - $7)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Mackerel is lower in Sugar (difference - 4.03g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Mackerel contains less Sodium (difference - 489mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Mackerel is lower in glycemic index (difference - 40)
Which food is richer in minerals?
Mackerel is relatively richer in minerals
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Mackerel is relatively richer in vitamins