Flank steak vs. Mustard — In-Depth Nutrition Comparison
Compare
The main differences between flank steak and mustard
- Flank steak is richer in vitamin B12, vitamin B3, vitamin B6, zinc, and choline, yet mustard is richer in manganese and fiber.
- Daily need coverage for vitamin B12 for flank steak is 68% higher.
- Flank steak has a lower glycemic index than mustard.
Food types used in this article are Beef, flank, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled and Mustard, prepared, yellow.
Infographic
Infographic link
Mineral Comparison
Mineral comparison score is based on the number of minerals by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more PotassiumPotassium | +123% |
| Contains more ZincZinc | +665.6% |
| Contains more PhosphorusPhosphorus | +94.4% |
| Contains less SodiumSodium | -94.9% |
| Contains more MagnesiumMagnesium | +108.7% |
| Contains more CalciumCalcium | +215% |
| Contains more ManganeseManganese | +4588.9% |
| Contains more SeleniumSelenium | +13.9% |
Vitamin Comparison
Vitamin comparison score is based on the number of vitamins by which one or the other food is richer. The "coverage" charts below show how much of the daily needs can be covered by 300 grams of the food.
| Contains more Vitamin B2Vitamin B2 | +90% |
| Contains more Vitamin B3Vitamin B3 | +1203.2% |
| Contains more Vitamin B5Vitamin B5 | +114.6% |
| Contains more Vitamin B6Vitamin B6 | +727.1% |
| Contains more Vitamin B12Vitamin B12 | +∞% |
| Contains more FolateFolate | +28.6% |
| Contains more CholineCholine | +370.5% |
| Contains more Vitamin CVitamin C | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin AVitamin A | +∞% |
| Contains more Vitamin B1Vitamin B1 | +136% |
Macronutrient Comparison
Macronutrient breakdown side-by-side comparison
Protein:
27.66 g
Fats:
8.23 g
Carbs:
0 g
Water:
64.17 g
Other:
0 g
Protein:
3.74 g
Fats:
3.34 g
Carbs:
5.83 g
Water:
83.72 g
Other:
3.37 g
| Contains more ProteinProtein | +639.6% |
| Contains more FatsFats | +146.4% |
| Contains more CarbsCarbs | +∞% |
| Contains more WaterWater | +30.5% |
~equal in
Other
~3.37g
Fat Type Comparison
Fat type breakdown side-by-side comparison
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
3.395 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
3.317 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.322 g
Saturated fat:
Sat. Fat
0.214 g
Monounsaturated fat:
Mono. Fat
2.182 g
Polyunsaturated fat:
Poly. Fat
0.774 g
| Contains more Mono. FatMonounsaturated fat | +52% |
| Contains less Sat. FatSaturated fat | -93.7% |
| Contains more Poly. FatPolyunsaturated fat | +140.4% |
Comparison summary table
Pay attention to the rightmost column. It displays the amounts side by side, giving a clearer understanding of the difference.
 |
 |
||
| Lower in Cholesterol |
|
||
| Lower in Saturated fat |
|
||
| Lower in Sugar |
|
||
| Lower in Sodium |
|
||
| Lower in Glycemic Index |
|
||
| Lower in price |
|
||
| Rich in vitamins |
|
||
| Rich in minerals | Equal | ||
All nutrients comparison - raw data values
| Nutrient | |
|
DV% diff. |
| Vitamin B12 | 1.63µg | 0µg | 68% |
| Protein | 27.66g | 3.74g | 48% |
| Sodium | 56mg | 1104mg | 46% |
| Vitamin B3 | 7.363mg | 0.565mg | 42% |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.579mg | 0.07mg | 39% |
| Zinc | 4.9mg | 0.64mg | 39% |
| Cholesterol | 79mg | 0mg | 26% |
| Manganese | 0.009mg | 0.422mg | 18% |
| Fiber | 0g | 4g | 16% |
| Phosphorus | 210mg | 108mg | 15% |
| Choline | 105.4mg | 22.4mg | 15% |
| Saturated fat | 3.395g | 0.214g | 14% |
| Vitamin B1 | 0.075mg | 0.177mg | 9% |
| Fats | 8.23g | 3.34g | 8% |
| Selenium | 29.4µg | 33.5µg | 7% |
| Calories | 192kcal | 60kcal | 7% |
| Potassium | 339mg | 152mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B5 | 0.545mg | 0.254mg | 6% |
| Magnesium | 23mg | 48mg | 6% |
| Vitamin B2 | 0.133mg | 0.07mg | 5% |
| Calcium | 20mg | 63mg | 4% |
| Polyunsaturated fat | 0.322g | 0.774g | 3% |
| Monounsaturated fat | 3.317g | 2.182g | 3% |
| Iron | 1.74mg | 1.61mg | 2% |
| Carbs | 0g | 5.83g | 2% |
| Vitamin A | 0µg | 5µg | 1% |
| Folate | 9µg | 7µg | 1% |
| Copper | 0.082mg | 0.074mg | 1% |
| Vitamin C | 0mg | 0.3mg | 0% |
| Net carbs | 0g | 1.83g | N/A |
| Sugar | 0g | 0.92g | N/A |
| Starch | 0.64g | 0% | |
| Vitamin E | 0.38mg | 0.36mg | 0% |
| Vitamin K | 1.4µg | 1.4µg | 0% |
| Trans fat | 0.009g | N/A | |
| Tryptophan | 0.182mg | 0.009mg | 0% |
| Threonine | 1.105mg | 0.167mg | 0% |
| Isoleucine | 1.259mg | 0.146mg | 0% |
| Leucine | 2.201mg | 0.292mg | 0% |
| Lysine | 2.338mg | 0.264mg | 0% |
| Methionine | 0.72mg | 0.076mg | 0% |
| Phenylalanine | 1.093mg | 0.161mg | 0% |
| Valine | 1.372mg | 0.189mg | 0% |
| Histidine | 0.883mg | 0.119mg | 0% |
| Fructose | 0.23g | 0% | |
| Omega-3 - ALA | 0.373g | N/A | |
| Omega-3 - Eicosatrienoic acid | 0.018g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Eicosadienoic acid | 0.01g | N/A | |
| Omega-6 - Linoleic acid | 0.358g | N/A |
Which food is preferable for your diet?
is better in case of low diet
|
|
|
| Low Calories diet |
|
|
| Low Fats diet |
|
|
| Low Carbs diet |
|
|
| Low Glycemic Index diet |
|
People also compare
Vitamins & Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
The summary scores indicate the extent to which this food can fulfill your daily vitamin and mineral requirements if you consume 3 servings, consisting of 100 grams of each (an approximation of 3 serving sizes).
Vitamins Daily Need Coverage Score
49%
10%
Minerals Daily Need Coverage Score
54%
60%
Comparison summary
Which food is lower in Cholesterol?
Mustard is lower in Cholesterol (difference - 79mg)
Which food is lower in Saturated fat?
Mustard is lower in Saturated fat (difference - 3.181g)
Which food is lower in Sugar?
Flank steak is lower in Sugar (difference - 0.92g)
Which food contains less Sodium?
Flank steak contains less Sodium (difference - 1048mg)
Which food is lower in glycemic index?
Flank steak is lower in glycemic index (difference - 32)
Which food is cheaper?
Flank steak is cheaper (difference - $2.1)
Which food is richer in vitamins?
Flank steak is relatively richer in vitamins
Which food is richer in minerals?
?
It cannot be stated which food is richer in vitamins. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information. See the charts below for detailed information.